[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"repo-stars":3,"vuln-CVE-2026-4480":6},{"stargazers_count":4,"fetched_at":5},6,"2026-05-28T13:18:46.456Z",{"id":7,"descriptions":8,"cisa":9,"weaknesses":10,"exploits":40,"aliases":41,"duplicate_of":9,"upstream":42,"downstream":43,"duplicates":52,"related":53,"reserved_at":9,"published_at":54,"modified_at":55,"state":56,"summary":57,"references_raw":66,"kevs":83,"epss":84,"epss_history":87,"metrics":92,"affected":100},"CVE-2026-4480","A flaw was found in the Samba printing subsystem. Samba passes the client-controlled job description string to the command configured with the \"print command\" setting via the \"%J\"\nsubstitution character without escaping shell meta characters. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted print job description that contains unescaped shell characters. This could lead to remote code execution on the affected system.",null,[11],{"_key":12,"id":12,"name":13,"description":14,"type":15,"status":16,"abstraction":17,"likelihood_of_exploit":18,"capec":19},"CWE-78","Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')","The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.","weakness","Stable","Base","High",[20,24,28,32,36],{"id":21,"name":22,"techniques":23},"CAPEC-108","Command Line Execution through SQL Injection",[],{"id":25,"name":26,"techniques":27},"CAPEC-15","Command Delimiters",[],{"id":29,"name":30,"techniques":31},"CAPEC-43","Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers",[],{"id":33,"name":34,"techniques":35},"CAPEC-6","Argument Injection",[],{"id":37,"name":38,"techniques":39},"CAPEC-88","OS Command Injection",[],[],[],[],[44,46,48,50],{"_key":45},"USN-8306-1",{"_key":47},"DEBIAN-CVE-2026-4480",{"_key":49},"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-4480",{"_key":51},"ALPINE-CVE-2026-4480",[],[],"2026-05-26T13:56:32.355Z","2026-05-27T12:56:00.952Z","Awaiting Analysis",{"cisa_kev":58,"cisa_ransomware":58,"cisa_vendor":9,"epss_severity":59,"epss_score":60,"severity":61,"severity_score":62,"severity_version":63,"severity_source":64,"severity_vector":65,"severity_status":56},false,"low",0.00077,"high",8.5,"v3.1","cve.org","CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",[67,74,79],{"url":68,"sources":69,"tags":71},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-4480",[64,70],"nvd",[72,73],"VDB Entry","X Refsource REDHAT",{"url":75,"sources":76,"tags":77},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452232",[64,70],[78,73],"Issue Tracking",{"url":80,"sources":81,"tags":82},"https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16033",[64,70],[],[],{"date":85,"score":60,"percentile":86},"2026-05-28",0.23034,[88,91],{"date":89,"score":60,"percentile":90},"2026-05-27",0.22908,{"date":85,"score":60,"percentile":86},[93,98],{"source":64,"cvss_v2_0":9,"cvss_v3_0":9,"cvss_v3_1":94,"cvss_v4_0":9},{"baseScore":62,"baseSeverity":95,"vectorString":65,"impactScore":96,"exploitabilityScore":97},"HIGH",10,4.6,{"source":70,"cvss_v2_0":9,"cvss_v3_0":9,"cvss_v3_1":99,"cvss_v4_0":9},{"baseScore":62,"baseSeverity":95,"vectorString":65,"impactScore":96,"exploitabilityScore":97},[]]