[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"repo-stars":3,"vuln-DEBIAN-CVE-2024-50301":6},{"stargazers_count":4,"fetched_at":5},7,"2026-06-04T14:53:31.930Z",{"id":7,"descriptions":8,"cisa":9,"weaknesses":10,"exploits":11,"aliases":12,"duplicate_of":9,"upstream":13,"downstream":16,"duplicates":23,"related":24,"reserved_at":9,"published_at":25,"modified_at":26,"state":9,"summary":27,"references_raw":29,"kevs":36,"epss":9,"epss_history":37,"metrics":38,"affected":45},"DEBIAN-CVE-2024-50301","In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:  security/keys: fix slab-out-of-bounds in key_task_permission  KASAN reports an out of bounds read: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in __kuid_val include/linux/uidgid.h:36 BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in uid_eq include/linux/uidgid.h:63 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in key_task_permission+0x394/0x410 security/keys/permission.c:54 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88813c3ab618 by task stress-ng/4362  CPU: 2 PID: 4362 Comm: stress-ng Not tainted 5.10.0-14930-gafbffd6c3ede #15 Call Trace:  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline]  dump_stack+0x107/0x167 lib/dump_stack.c:123  print_address_description.constprop.0+0x19/0x170 mm/kasan/report.c:400  __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560  kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585  __kuid_val include/linux/uidgid.h:36 [inline]  uid_eq include/linux/uidgid.h:63 [inline]  key_task_permission+0x394/0x410 security/keys/permission.c:54  search_nested_keyrings+0x90e/0xe90 security/keys/keyring.c:793  This issue was also reported by syzbot.  It can be reproduced by following these steps(more details [1]): 1. Obtain more than 32 inputs that have similar hashes, which ends with the    pattern '0xxxxxxxe6'. 2. Reboot and add the keys obtained in step 1.  The reproducer demonstrates how this issue happened: 1. In the search_nested_keyrings function, when it iterates through the    slots in a node(below tag ascend_to_node), if the slot pointer is meta    and node->back_pointer != NULL(it means a root), it will proceed to    descend_to_node. However, there is an exception. If node is the root,    and one of the slots points to a shortcut, it will be treated as a    keyring. 2. Whether the ptr is keyring decided by keyring_ptr_is_keyring function.    However, KEYRING_PTR_SUBTYPE is 0x2UL, the same as    ASSOC_ARRAY_PTR_SUBTYPE_MASK. 3. When 32 keys with the similar hashes are added to the tree, the ROOT    has keys with hashes that are not similar (e.g. slot 0) and it splits    NODE A without using a shortcut. When NODE A is filled with keys that    all hashes are xxe6, the keys are similar, NODE A will split with a    shortcut. Finally, it forms the tree as shown below, where slot 6 points    to a shortcut.                        NODE A               +------>+---+       ROOT    |       | 0 | xxe6       +---+   |       +---+  xxxx | 0 | shortcut  :   : xxe6       +---+   |       +---+  xxe6 :   :   |       |   | xxe6       +---+   |       +---+       | 6 |---+       :   : xxe6       +---+           +---+  xxe6 :   :           | f | xxe6       +---+           +---+  xxe6 | f |       +---+  4. As mentioned above, If a slot(slot 6) of the root points to a shortcut,    it may be mistakenly transferred to a key*, leading to a read    out-of-bounds read.  To fix this issue, one should jump to descend_to_node if the ptr is a shortcut, regardless of whether the node is root or not.  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/1cfa878e-8c7b-4570-8606-21daf5e13ce7@huaweicloud.com/  [jarkko: tweaked the commit message a bit to have an appropriate closes  tag.]",null,[],[],[],[14],{"_key":15},"CVE-2024-50301",[17,19,21],{"_key":18},"DLA-4008-1",{"_key":20},"DLA-4075-1",{"_key":22},"DSA-5818-1",[],[],"2024-11-19T02:16:32.230Z","2026-04-28T20:28:54.908438Z",{"cisa_kev":28,"cisa_ransomware":28,"cisa_vendor":9,"epss_severity":9,"epss_score":9,"severity":9,"severity_score":9,"severity_version":9,"severity_source":9,"severity_vector":9,"severity_status":9},false,[30],{"url":31,"sources":32,"tags":34},"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-50301",[33],"osv_debian",[35],"Advisory",[],[],[39],{"source":33,"cvss_v2_0":9,"cvss_v3_0":9,"cvss_v3_1":40,"cvss_v4_0":9},{"baseScore":41,"baseSeverity":9,"vectorString":42,"impactScore":43,"exploitabilityScore":44},7.1,"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",8.7,4.6,[46,65],{"ecosystem":47,"name":48,"vendor":49,"product":48,"cpe_part":9,"purl_type":50,"purl_namespace":49,"purl_name":48,"source":9,"versions":51},"Debian","linux","debian","deb",[52,58,61,64],{"version":53,"is_range":54,"range_type":55,"version_start":9,"version_start_type":9,"version_end":56,"version_end_type":57,"fixed_in":9},"lt5_10_234_1",true,"ecosystem","5.10.234-1","excluding",{"version":59,"is_range":54,"range_type":55,"version_start":9,"version_start_type":9,"version_end":60,"version_end_type":57,"fixed_in":9},"lt6_1_119_1","6.1.119-1",{"version":62,"is_range":54,"range_type":55,"version_start":9,"version_start_type":9,"version_end":63,"version_end_type":57,"fixed_in":9},"lt6_11_9_1","6.11.9-1",{"version":62,"is_range":54,"range_type":55,"version_start":9,"version_start_type":9,"version_end":63,"version_end_type":57,"fixed_in":9},{"ecosystem":47,"name":66,"vendor":49,"product":66,"cpe_part":9,"purl_type":50,"purl_namespace":49,"purl_name":66,"source":9,"versions":67},"linux-6.1",[68],{"version":69,"is_range":54,"range_type":55,"version_start":9,"version_start_type":9,"version_end":70,"version_end_type":57,"fixed_in":9},"lt6_1_119_1~deb11u1","6.1.119-1~deb11u1"]