[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"repo-stars":3,"vuln-RHSA-2026:7307":6},{"stargazers_count":4,"fetched_at":5},7,"2026-06-05T08:55:32.481Z",{"id":7,"descriptions":8,"cisa":9,"weaknesses":10,"exploits":11,"aliases":12,"duplicate_of":9,"upstream":13,"downstream":86,"duplicates":87,"related":88,"reserved_at":9,"published_at":89,"modified_at":90,"state":9,"summary":91,"references_raw":93,"kevs":734,"epss":9,"epss_history":735,"metrics":736,"affected":743},"RHSA-2026:7307","Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update",null,[],[],[],[14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56,58,60,62,64,66,68,70,72,74,76,78,80,82,84],{"_key":15},"CVE-2008-1891",{"_key":17},"CVE-2008-2662",{"_key":19},"CVE-2008-2663",{"_key":21},"CVE-2008-2664",{"_key":23},"CVE-2008-2725",{"_key":25},"CVE-2008-2726",{"_key":27},"CVE-2008-3655",{"_key":29},"CVE-2008-3656",{"_key":31},"CVE-2008-3657",{"_key":33},"CVE-2008-3905",{"_key":35},"CVE-2009-5147",{"_key":37},"CVE-2011-0188",{"_key":39},"CVE-2011-2686",{"_key":41},"CVE-2011-2705",{"_key":43},"CVE-2011-3009",{"_key":45},"CVE-2011-4815",{"_key":47},"CVE-2012-5371",{"_key":49},"CVE-2013-1821",{"_key":51},"CVE-2014-4975",{"_key":53},"CVE-2014-6438",{"_key":55},"CVE-2014-8080",{"_key":57},"CVE-2014-8090",{"_key":59},"CVE-2015-7551",{"_key":61},"CVE-2015-9096",{"_key":63},"CVE-2017-10784",{"_key":65},"CVE-2017-14064",{"_key":67},"CVE-2018-8780",{"_key":69},"CVE-2019-16254",{"_key":71},"CVE-2020-25613",{"_key":73},"CVE-2021-28965",{"_key":75},"CVE-2021-31810",{"_key":77},"CVE-2021-41819",{"_key":79},"CVE-2022-28739",{"_key":81},"CVE-2023-28756",{"_key":83},"CVE-2024-27282",{"_key":85},"CVE-2026-27820",[],[],[],"2026-04-21T10:09:49Z","2026-05-22T10:08:36Z",{"cisa_kev":92,"cisa_ransomware":92,"cisa_vendor":9,"epss_severity":9,"epss_score":9,"severity":9,"severity_score":9,"severity_version":9,"severity_source":9,"severity_vector":9,"severity_status":9},false,[94,100,105,110,114,118,122,126,130,134,138,142,146,150,154,158,162,166,170,174,178,182,186,190,194,198,202,206,210,214,218,222,226,230,234,238,242,246,250,254,258,262,266,270,274,278,282,286,290,294,298,302,306,310,314,318,322,326,330,334,338,342,346,350,354,358,362,366,370,374,378,382,386,390,394,398,402,406,410,414,418,422,426,430,434,438,442,446,450,454,458,462,466,470,474,478,482,486,490,494,498,502,506,510,514,518,522,526,530,534,538,542,546,550,554,558,562,566,570,574,578,582,586,590,594,598,602,606,610,614,618,622,626,630,634,638,642,646,650,654,658,662,666,670,674,678,682,686,690,694,698,702,706,710,714,718,722,726,730],{"url":95,"sources":96,"tags":98},"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7307",[97],"osv_red_hat",[99],"Advisory",{"url":101,"sources":102,"tags":103},"https://images.redhat.com/",[97],[104],"ARTICLE",{"url":106,"sources":107,"tags":108},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-27820",[97],[109],"REPORT",{"url":111,"sources":112,"tags":113},"https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",[97],[104],{"url":115,"sources":116,"tags":117},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-3905",[97],[109],{"url":119,"sources":120,"tags":121},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-3657",[97],[109],{"url":123,"sources":124,"tags":125},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-3656",[97],[109],{"url":127,"sources":128,"tags":129},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-3655",[97],[109],{"url":131,"sources":132,"tags":133},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-27282",[97],[109],{"url":135,"sources":136,"tags":137},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-31810",[97],[109],{"url":139,"sources":140,"tags":141},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-16254",[97],[109],{"url":143,"sources":144,"tags":145},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-8780",[97],[109],{"url":147,"sources":148,"tags":149},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-14064",[97],[109],{"url":151,"sources":152,"tags":153},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-10784",[97],[109],{"url":155,"sources":156,"tags":157},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-9096",[97],[109],{"url":159,"sources":160,"tags":161},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-8090",[97],[109],{"url":163,"sources":164,"tags":165},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-8080",[97],[109],{"url":167,"sources":168,"tags":169},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-6438",[97],[109],{"url":171,"sources":172,"tags":173},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-4975",[97],[109],{"url":175,"sources":176,"tags":177},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2013-1821",[97],[109],{"url":179,"sources":180,"tags":181},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-5371",[97],[109],{"url":183,"sources":184,"tags":185},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-4815",[97],[109],{"url":187,"sources":188,"tags":189},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-1891",[97],[109],{"url":191,"sources":192,"tags":193},"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_7307.json",[97],[99],{"url":195,"sources":196,"tags":197},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443829",[97],[109],{"url":199,"sources":200,"tags":201},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-1891",[97],[99],{"url":203,"sources":204,"tags":205},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1891",[97],[99],{"url":207,"sources":208,"tags":209},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458948",[97],[109],{"url":211,"sources":212,"tags":213},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-3655",[97],[99],{"url":215,"sources":216,"tags":217},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3655",[97],[99],{"url":219,"sources":220,"tags":221},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458953",[97],[109],{"url":223,"sources":224,"tags":225},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-3656",[97],[99],{"url":227,"sources":228,"tags":229},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3656",[97],[99],{"url":231,"sources":232,"tags":233},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458966",[97],[109],{"url":235,"sources":236,"tags":237},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-3657",[97],[99],{"url":239,"sources":240,"tags":241},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3657",[97],[99],{"url":243,"sources":244,"tags":245},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461495",[97],[109],{"url":247,"sources":248,"tags":249},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-3905",[97],[99],{"url":251,"sources":252,"tags":253},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3905",[97],[99],{"url":255,"sources":256,"tags":257},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750564",[97],[109],{"url":259,"sources":260,"tags":261},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-4815",[97],[99],{"url":263,"sources":264,"tags":265},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4815",[97],[99],{"url":267,"sources":268,"tags":269},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875236",[97],[109],{"url":271,"sources":272,"tags":273},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-5371",[97],[99],{"url":275,"sources":276,"tags":277},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-5371",[97],[99],{"url":279,"sources":280,"tags":281},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914716",[97],[109],{"url":283,"sources":284,"tags":285},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-1821",[97],[99],{"url":287,"sources":288,"tags":289},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1821",[97],[99],{"url":291,"sources":292,"tags":293},"http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2013/02/22/rexml-dos-2013-02-22/",[97],[104],{"url":295,"sources":296,"tags":297},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118158",[97],[109],{"url":299,"sources":300,"tags":301},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-4975",[97],[99],{"url":303,"sources":304,"tags":305},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-4975",[97],[99],{"url":307,"sources":308,"tags":309},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490845",[97],[109],{"url":311,"sources":312,"tags":313},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-6438",[97],[99],{"url":315,"sources":316,"tags":317},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-6438",[97],[99],{"url":319,"sources":320,"tags":321},"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2014/08/19/ruby-1-9-2-p330-released/",[97],[104],{"url":323,"sources":324,"tags":325},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157709",[97],[109],{"url":327,"sources":328,"tags":329},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-8080",[97],[99],{"url":331,"sources":332,"tags":333},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-8080",[97],[99],{"url":335,"sources":336,"tags":337},"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2014/10/27/rexml-dos-cve-2014-8080/",[97],[104],{"url":339,"sources":340,"tags":341},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159927",[97],[109],{"url":343,"sources":344,"tags":345},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-8090",[97],[99],{"url":347,"sources":348,"tags":349},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-8090",[97],[99],{"url":351,"sources":352,"tags":353},"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2014/11/13/rexml-dos-cve-2014-8090/",[97],[104],{"url":355,"sources":356,"tags":357},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461846",[97],[109],{"url":359,"sources":360,"tags":361},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-9096",[97],[99],{"url":363,"sources":364,"tags":365},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-9096",[97],[99],{"url":367,"sources":368,"tags":369},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492012",[97],[109],{"url":371,"sources":372,"tags":373},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-10784",[97],[99],{"url":375,"sources":376,"tags":377},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-10784",[97],[99],{"url":379,"sources":380,"tags":381},"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2017/09/14/webrick-basic-auth-escape-sequence-injection-cve-2017-10784/",[97],[104],{"url":383,"sources":384,"tags":385},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487552",[97],[109],{"url":387,"sources":388,"tags":389},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-14064",[97],[99],{"url":391,"sources":392,"tags":393},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14064",[97],[99],{"url":395,"sources":396,"tags":397},"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2017/09/14/json-heap-exposure-cve-2017-14064/",[97],[104],{"url":399,"sources":400,"tags":401},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561949",[97],[109],{"url":403,"sources":404,"tags":405},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8780",[97],[99],{"url":407,"sources":408,"tags":409},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-8780",[97],[99],{"url":411,"sources":412,"tags":413},"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/03/28/poisoned-nul-byte-dir-cve-2018-8780/",[97],[104],{"url":415,"sources":416,"tags":417},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789556",[97],[109],{"url":419,"sources":420,"tags":421},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16254",[97],[99],{"url":423,"sources":424,"tags":425},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16254",[97],[99],{"url":427,"sources":428,"tags":429},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980126",[97],[109],{"url":431,"sources":432,"tags":433},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31810",[97],[99],{"url":435,"sources":436,"tags":437},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31810",[97],[99],{"url":439,"sources":440,"tags":441},"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2021/07/07/trusting-pasv-responses-in-net-ftp/",[97],[104],{"url":443,"sources":444,"tags":445},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276810",[97],[109],{"url":447,"sources":448,"tags":449},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27282",[97],[99],{"url":451,"sources":452,"tags":453},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27282",[97],[99],{"url":455,"sources":456,"tags":457},"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2024/04/23/arbitrary-memory-address-read-regexp-cve-2024-27282/",[97],[104],{"url":459,"sources":460,"tags":461},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2459002",[97],[109],{"url":463,"sources":464,"tags":465},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27820",[97],[99],{"url":467,"sources":468,"tags":469},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-27820",[97],[99],{"url":471,"sources":472,"tags":473},"https://github.com/ruby/zlib/security/advisories/GHSA-g857-hhfv-j68w",[97],[104],{"url":475,"sources":476,"tags":477},"https://hackerone.com/reports/3467067",[97],[104],{"url":479,"sources":480,"tags":481},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-28756",[97],[109],{"url":483,"sources":484,"tags":485},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-28739",[97],[109],{"url":487,"sources":488,"tags":489},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-41819",[97],[109],{"url":491,"sources":492,"tags":493},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-28965",[97],[109],{"url":495,"sources":496,"tags":497},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25613",[97],[109],{"url":499,"sources":500,"tags":501},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883623",[97],[109],{"url":503,"sources":504,"tags":505},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25613",[97],[99],{"url":507,"sources":508,"tags":509},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-25613",[97],[99],{"url":511,"sources":512,"tags":513},"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2020/09/29/http-request-smuggling-cve-2020-25613/",[97],[104],{"url":515,"sources":516,"tags":517},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947526",[97],[109],{"url":519,"sources":520,"tags":521},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28965",[97],[99],{"url":523,"sources":524,"tags":525},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-28965",[97],[99],{"url":527,"sources":528,"tags":529},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026757",[97],[109],{"url":531,"sources":532,"tags":533},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41819",[97],[99],{"url":535,"sources":536,"tags":537},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-41819",[97],[99],{"url":539,"sources":540,"tags":541},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075687",[97],[109],{"url":543,"sources":544,"tags":545},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28739",[97],[99],{"url":547,"sources":548,"tags":549},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-28739",[97],[99],{"url":551,"sources":552,"tags":553},"http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2022/04/12/buffer-overrun-in-string-to-float-cve-2022-28739/",[97],[104],{"url":555,"sources":556,"tags":557},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184061",[97],[109],{"url":559,"sources":560,"tags":561},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28756",[97],[99],{"url":563,"sources":564,"tags":565},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28756",[97],[99],{"url":567,"sources":568,"tags":569},"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/03/30/redos-in-time-cve-2023-28756/",[97],[104],{"url":571,"sources":572,"tags":573},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-2662",[97],[109],{"url":575,"sources":576,"tags":577},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-2726",[97],[109],{"url":579,"sources":580,"tags":581},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-2663",[97],[109],{"url":583,"sources":584,"tags":585},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-2725",[97],[109],{"url":587,"sources":588,"tags":589},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-0188",[97],[109],{"url":591,"sources":592,"tags":593},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-2664",[97],[109],{"url":595,"sources":596,"tags":597},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-2686",[97],[109],{"url":599,"sources":600,"tags":601},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-3009",[97],[109],{"url":603,"sources":604,"tags":605},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-2705",[97],[109],{"url":607,"sources":608,"tags":609},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-5147",[97],[109],{"url":611,"sources":612,"tags":613},"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-7551",[97],[109],{"url":615,"sources":616,"tags":617},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450821",[97],[109],{"url":619,"sources":620,"tags":621},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-2662",[97],[99],{"url":623,"sources":624,"tags":625},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-2662",[97],[99],{"url":627,"sources":628,"tags":629},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450825",[97],[109],{"url":631,"sources":632,"tags":633},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-2663",[97],[99],{"url":635,"sources":636,"tags":637},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-2663",[97],[99],{"url":639,"sources":640,"tags":641},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450834",[97],[109],{"url":643,"sources":644,"tags":645},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-2664",[97],[99],{"url":647,"sources":648,"tags":649},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-2664",[97],[99],{"url":651,"sources":652,"tags":653},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451821",[97],[109],{"url":655,"sources":656,"tags":657},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-2725",[97],[99],{"url":659,"sources":660,"tags":661},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-2725",[97],[99],{"url":663,"sources":664,"tags":665},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451828",[97],[109],{"url":667,"sources":668,"tags":669},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-2726",[97],[99],{"url":671,"sources":672,"tags":673},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-2726",[97],[99],{"url":675,"sources":676,"tags":677},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248935",[97],[109],{"url":679,"sources":680,"tags":681},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-5147",[97],[99],{"url":683,"sources":684,"tags":685},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-5147",[97],[99],{"url":687,"sources":688,"tags":689},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682332",[97],[109],{"url":691,"sources":692,"tags":693},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-0188",[97],[99],{"url":695,"sources":696,"tags":697},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0188",[97],[99],{"url":699,"sources":700,"tags":701},"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722415",[97],[109],{"url":703,"sources":704,"tags":705},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-2686",[97],[99],{"url":707,"sources":708,"tags":709},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2686",[97],[99],{"url":711,"sources":712,"tags":713},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-2705",[97],[99],{"url":715,"sources":716,"tags":717},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2705",[97],[99],{"url":719,"sources":720,"tags":721},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-3009",[97],[99],{"url":723,"sources":724,"tags":725},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3009",[97],[99],{"url":727,"sources":728,"tags":729},"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7551",[97],[99],{"url":731,"sources":732,"tags":733},"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7551",[97],[99],[],[],[737],{"source":97,"cvss_v2_0":9,"cvss_v3_0":9,"cvss_v3_1":738,"cvss_v4_0":9},{"baseScore":739,"baseSeverity":9,"vectorString":740,"impactScore":741,"exploitabilityScore":742},7.5,"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",6,10,[744,756],{"ecosystem":745,"name":746,"vendor":747,"product":746,"cpe_part":9,"purl_type":748,"purl_namespace":747,"purl_name":746,"source":9,"versions":749},"Red Hat","ruby3.4","redhat","rpm",[750],{"version":751,"is_range":752,"range_type":753,"version_start":9,"version_start_type":9,"version_end":754,"version_end_type":755,"fixed_in":9},"lt0:3_4_8_31_1_hum1",true,"ecosystem","0:3.4.8-31.1.hum1","excluding",{"ecosystem":745,"name":757,"vendor":747,"product":757,"cpe_part":9,"purl_type":748,"purl_namespace":747,"purl_name":757,"source":9,"versions":758},"ruby3.4-default-gems",[759],{"version":751,"is_range":752,"range_type":753,"version_start":9,"version_start_type":9,"version_end":754,"version_end_type":755,"fixed_in":9}]