[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"repo-stars":3,"vuln-SUSE-SU-2016:2781-1":6},{"stargazers_count":4,"fetched_at":5},7,"2026-06-04T20:55:29.923Z",{"id":7,"descriptions":8,"cisa":9,"weaknesses":10,"exploits":11,"aliases":12,"duplicate_of":9,"upstream":13,"downstream":56,"duplicates":57,"related":58,"reserved_at":9,"published_at":80,"modified_at":81,"state":9,"summary":82,"references_raw":84,"kevs":261,"epss":9,"epss_history":262,"metrics":263,"affected":264},"SUSE-SU-2016:2781-1","Security update for qemu\n\nqemu was updated to fix 21 security issues.\n\nThese security issues were fixed:\n- CVE-2014-5388: Off-by-one error in the pci_read function in the ACPI PCI hotplug interface (hw/acpi/pcihp.c) in QEMU allowed local guest users to obtain sensitive information and have other unspecified impact related to a crafted PCI device that triggers memory corruption (bsc#893323).\n- CVE-2015-6815: e1000 NIC emulation support was vulnerable to an infinite loop issue. A privileged user inside guest could have used this flaw to crash the Qemu instance resulting in DoS.  (bsc#944697).\n- CVE-2016-2391: The ohci_bus_start function in the USB OHCI emulation support (hw/usb/hcd-ohci.c) in QEMU allowed local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and QEMU process crash) via vectors related to multiple eof_timers (bsc#967013).\n- CVE-2016-2392: The is_rndis function in the USB Net device emulator (hw/usb/dev-network.c) in QEMU did not properly validate USB configuration descriptor objects, which allowed local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and QEMU process crash) via vectors involving a remote NDIS control message packet (bsc#967012).\n- CVE-2016-4453: The vmsvga_fifo_run function in hw/display/vmware_vga.c in QEMU allowed local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and QEMU process crash) via a VGA command (bsc#982223).\n- CVE-2016-4454: The vmsvga_fifo_read_raw function in hw/display/vmware_vga.c in QEMU allowed local guest OS administrators to obtain sensitive host memory information or cause a denial of service (QEMU process crash) by changing FIFO registers and issuing a VGA command, which triggers an out-of-bounds read (bsc#982222).\n- CVE-2016-5105: The megasas_dcmd_cfg_read function in hw/scsi/megasas.c in QEMU, when built with MegaRAID SAS 8708EM2 Host Bus Adapter emulation support, used an uninitialized variable, which allowed local guest administrators to read host memory via vectors involving a MegaRAID Firmware Interface (MFI) command (bsc#982017).\n- CVE-2016-5106: The megasas_dcmd_set_properties function in hw/scsi/megasas.c in QEMU, when built with MegaRAID SAS 8708EM2 Host Bus Adapter emulation support, allowed local guest administrators to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write access) via vectors involving a MegaRAID Firmware Interface (MFI) command (bsc#982018).\n- CVE-2016-5107: The megasas_lookup_frame function in QEMU, when built with MegaRAID SAS 8708EM2 Host Bus Adapter emulation support, allowed local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and crash) via unspecified vectors (bsc#982019).\n- CVE-2016-5126: Heap-based buffer overflow in the iscsi_aio_ioctl function in block/iscsi.c in QEMU allowed local guest OS users to cause a denial of service (QEMU process crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted iSCSI asynchronous I/O ioctl call (bsc#982285).\n- CVE-2016-5238: The get_cmd function in hw/scsi/esp.c in QEMU allowed local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and QEMU process crash) via vectors related to reading from the information transfer buffer in non-DMA mode (bsc#982959).\n- CVE-2016-5337: The megasas_ctrl_get_info function in hw/scsi/megasas.c in QEMU allowed local guest OS administrators to obtain sensitive host memory information via vectors related to reading device control information (bsc#983961).\n- CVE-2016-5338: The (1) esp_reg_read and (2) esp_reg_write functions in hw/scsi/esp.c in QEMU allowed local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (QEMU process crash) or execute arbitrary code on the QEMU host via vectors related to the information transfer buffer (bsc#983982).\n- CVE-2016-5403: The virtqueue_pop function in hw/virtio/virtio.c in QEMU allowed local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and QEMU process crash) by submitting requests without waiting for completion (bsc#991080).\n- CVE-2016-6490: Infinite loop in the virtio framework. A privileged user inside the guest could have used this flaw to crash the Qemu instance on the host resulting in DoS (bsc#991466).\n- CVE-2016-6833: Use-after-free issue in the VMWARE VMXNET3 NIC device support. A privileged user inside guest could have used this issue to crash the Qemu instance resulting in DoS (bsc#994774).\n- CVE-2016-6836: VMWARE VMXNET3 NIC device support was leaging information leakage. A privileged user inside guest could have used this to leak host memory bytes to a guest (bsc#994760).\n- CVE-2016-6888: Integer overflow in packet initialisation in VMXNET3 device driver. A privileged user inside guest could have used this flaw to crash the Qemu instance resulting in DoS (bsc#994771).\n- CVE-2016-7116: Host directory sharing via Plan 9 File System(9pfs) was vulnerable to a directory/path traversal issue. A privileged user inside guest could have used this flaw to access undue files on the host (bsc#996441).\n- CVE-2016-7155: In the VMWARE PVSCSI paravirtual SCSI bus a OOB access and/or infinite loop issue could have allowed a privileged user inside guest to crash the Qemu process resulting in DoS (bsc#997858).\n- CVE-2016-7156: In the VMWARE PVSCSI paravirtual SCSI bus a infinite loop issue could have allowed a privileged user inside guest to crash the Qemu process resulting in DoS (bsc#997859).\n",null,[],[],[],[14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54],{"_key":15},"CVE-2014-5388",{"_key":17},"CVE-2015-6815",{"_key":19},"CVE-2016-2391",{"_key":21},"CVE-2016-2392",{"_key":23},"CVE-2016-4453",{"_key":25},"CVE-2016-4454",{"_key":27},"CVE-2016-5105",{"_key":29},"CVE-2016-5106",{"_key":31},"CVE-2016-5107",{"_key":33},"CVE-2016-5126",{"_key":35},"CVE-2016-5238",{"_key":37},"CVE-2016-5337",{"_key":39},"CVE-2016-5338",{"_key":41},"CVE-2016-5403",{"_key":43},"CVE-2016-6490",{"_key":45},"CVE-2016-6833",{"_key":47},"CVE-2016-6836",{"_key":49},"CVE-2016-6888",{"_key":51},"CVE-2016-7116",{"_key":53},"CVE-2016-7155",{"_key":55},"CVE-2016-7156",[],[],[59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79],{"_key":15},{"_key":17},{"_key":19},{"_key":21},{"_key":23},{"_key":25},{"_key":27},{"_key":29},{"_key":31},{"_key":33},{"_key":35},{"_key":37},{"_key":39},{"_key":41},{"_key":43},{"_key":45},{"_key":47},{"_key":49},{"_key":51},{"_key":53},{"_key":55},"2016-11-12T03:12:32Z","2026-02-04T03:59:41.887189Z",{"cisa_kev":83,"cisa_ransomware":83,"cisa_vendor":9,"epss_severity":9,"epss_score":9,"severity":9,"severity_score":9,"severity_version":9,"severity_source":9,"severity_vector":9,"severity_status":9},false,[85,91,96,100,104,108,112,116,120,124,128,132,136,140,144,148,152,156,160,164,168,172,176,181,185,189,193,197,201,205,209,213,217,221,225,229,233,237,241,245,249,253,257],{"url":86,"sources":87,"tags":89},"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2016/suse-su-20162781-1/",[88],"osv_suse",[90],"Advisory",{"url":92,"sources":93,"tags":94},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/893323",[88],[95],"REPORT",{"url":97,"sources":98,"tags":99},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/944697",[88],[95],{"url":101,"sources":102,"tags":103},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/967012",[88],[95],{"url":105,"sources":106,"tags":107},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/967013",[88],[95],{"url":109,"sources":110,"tags":111},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/982017",[88],[95],{"url":113,"sources":114,"tags":115},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/982018",[88],[95],{"url":117,"sources":118,"tags":119},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/982019",[88],[95],{"url":121,"sources":122,"tags":123},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/982222",[88],[95],{"url":125,"sources":126,"tags":127},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/982223",[88],[95],{"url":129,"sources":130,"tags":131},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/982285",[88],[95],{"url":133,"sources":134,"tags":135},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/982959",[88],[95],{"url":137,"sources":138,"tags":139},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/983961",[88],[95],{"url":141,"sources":142,"tags":143},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/983982",[88],[95],{"url":145,"sources":146,"tags":147},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/991080",[88],[95],{"url":149,"sources":150,"tags":151},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/991466",[88],[95],{"url":153,"sources":154,"tags":155},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/994760",[88],[95],{"url":157,"sources":158,"tags":159},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/994771",[88],[95],{"url":161,"sources":162,"tags":163},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/994774",[88],[95],{"url":165,"sources":166,"tags":167},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/996441",[88],[95],{"url":169,"sources":170,"tags":171},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/997858",[88],[95],{"url":173,"sources":174,"tags":175},"https://bugzilla.suse.com/997859",[88],[95],{"url":177,"sources":178,"tags":179},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-5388",[88],[180],"WEB",{"url":182,"sources":183,"tags":184},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-6815",[88],[180],{"url":186,"sources":187,"tags":188},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2391",[88],[180],{"url":190,"sources":191,"tags":192},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2392",[88],[180],{"url":194,"sources":195,"tags":196},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4453",[88],[180],{"url":198,"sources":199,"tags":200},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4454",[88],[180],{"url":202,"sources":203,"tags":204},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5105",[88],[180],{"url":206,"sources":207,"tags":208},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5106",[88],[180],{"url":210,"sources":211,"tags":212},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5107",[88],[180],{"url":214,"sources":215,"tags":216},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5126",[88],[180],{"url":218,"sources":219,"tags":220},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5238",[88],[180],{"url":222,"sources":223,"tags":224},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5337",[88],[180],{"url":226,"sources":227,"tags":228},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5338",[88],[180],{"url":230,"sources":231,"tags":232},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5403",[88],[180],{"url":234,"sources":235,"tags":236},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6490",[88],[180],{"url":238,"sources":239,"tags":240},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6833",[88],[180],{"url":242,"sources":243,"tags":244},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6836",[88],[180],{"url":246,"sources":247,"tags":248},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6888",[88],[180],{"url":250,"sources":251,"tags":252},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7116",[88],[180],{"url":254,"sources":255,"tags":256},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7155",[88],[180],{"url":258,"sources":259,"tags":260},"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7156",[88],[180],[],[],[],[265,278],{"ecosystem":266,"name":267,"vendor":268,"product":269,"cpe_part":9,"purl_type":270,"purl_namespace":268,"purl_name":269,"source":9,"versions":271},"SUSE Linux Enterprise","qemu","suse","qemu&distro=SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12-LTSS","rpm",[272],{"version":273,"is_range":274,"range_type":275,"version_start":9,"version_start_type":9,"version_end":276,"version_end_type":277,"fixed_in":9},"lt2_0_2_48_22_1",true,"ecosystem","2.0.2-48.22.1","excluding",{"ecosystem":266,"name":267,"vendor":268,"product":279,"cpe_part":9,"purl_type":270,"purl_namespace":268,"purl_name":279,"source":9,"versions":280},"qemu&distro=SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12",[281],{"version":273,"is_range":274,"range_type":275,"version_start":9,"version_start_type":9,"version_end":276,"version_end_type":277,"fixed_in":9}]