Adobe Experience Manager vulnerabilities, page 3

1,269 vulnerabilities

Known vulnerabilities in Adobe Experience Manager, newest first, with CVSS severity, EPSS, KEV listings, ransomware use and the affected versions.

7.8CVE-2016-0956adobeexperience_manager+1
EPSS score
51.15%
The Servlets Post component 2.3.6 in Apache Sling, as used in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
7.8CVE-2016-0957adobedispatcher+1
EPSS score
51.99%
Dispatcher before 4.1.5 in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 does not properly implement a URL filter, which allows remote attackers to bypass dispatcher rules via unspecified vectors.
6.1CVE-2016-4170adobeexperience_manager
EPSS score
1.73%
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
5.3CVE-2016-4253adobeexperience_manager
EPSS score
2.75%
The Backup functionality in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
5.3CVE-2016-4169adobeexperience_manager
EPSS score
2.75%
Adobe Experience Manager 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2 allow attackers to obtain sensitive audit log event information via unspecified vectors.
6.1CVE-2016-4168adobeexperience_manager
EPSS score
1.73%
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager 5.6.1, 6.0, and 6.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
6.1CVE-2016-7882adobeexperience_manager
EPSS score
2.64%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.2 and earlier have an input validation issue in the WCMDebug filter that could be used in cross-site scripting attacks.
6.1CVE-2016-7883adobeexperience_manager
EPSS score
2.62%
Adobe Experience Manager version 6.2 has an input validation issue in create Launch wizard that could be used in cross-site scripting attacks.
6.1CVE-2016-7884adobeexperience_manager
EPSS score
2.62%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.1 and earlier have an input validation issue in the DAM create assets that could be used in cross-site scripting attacks.
8.8CVE-2016-7885adobeexperience_manager
EPSS score
3.45%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.2 and earlier have a vulnerability that could be used in Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks.
6.1CVE-2016-6933adobeexperience_manager+1
EPSS score
2.00%
Adobe Experience Manager Forms versions 6.2 and earlier, LiveCycle 11.0.1, LiveCycle 10.0.4 have an input validation issue in the AACComponent that could be used in cross-site scripting attacks.
6.5CVE-2025-54247adobeadobe experience manager+1
EPSS score
0.47%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access.
6.5CVE-2025-54249adobeadobe experience manager+1
EPSS score
1.92%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to manipulate server-side requests and bypass security controls allowing unauthorized read access.
7.7CVE-2025-54248adobeadobe experience manager+1
EPSS score
6.48%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Scope is changed
5.4CVE-2025-54272adobeadobe experience manager+1
EPSS score
0.24%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.
4.3CVE-2025-54251adobeadobe experience manager+1
EPSS score
1.71%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by an XML Injection vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to manipulate XML queries and gain limited unauthorized write access.
4.9CVE-2025-54250adobeadobe experience manager+1
EPSS score
0.42%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access.
5.4CVE-2025-54252adobeadobe experience manager+1
EPSS score
5.62%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. This could result in bypassing security features within the application. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
6.5CVE-2025-54246adobeadobe experience manager+1
EPSS score
0.40%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23.0 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access.
5.4CVE-2025-61796adobeadobe experience manager+1
EPSS score
0.24%
Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.