Cisco Asr 1001 vulnerabilities

15 vulnerabilities

Known vulnerabilities in Cisco Asr 1001, newest first, with CVSS severity, EPSS, KEV listings, ransomware use and the affected versions.

7.8CVE-2013-2779ciscoasr_1001_firmware+8
EPSS score
1.96%
Cisco IOS XE 3.4 before 3.4.5S, and 3.5 through 3.7 before 3.7.1S, on 1000 series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR) does not properly implement the Cisco Multicast Leaf Recycle Elimination (MLRE) feature, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (card reload) via fragmented IPv6 MVPN (aka MVPNv6) packets, aka Bug ID CSCub34945, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-1164.7.8CVE-2013-1166ciscoasr_1001_firmware+7
EPSS score
1.89%
Cisco IOS XE 3.2 through 3.4 before 3.4.5S, and 3.5 through 3.7 before 3.7.1S, on 1000 series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR), when VRF-aware NAT and SIP ALG are enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (card reload) by sending many SIP packets, aka Bug ID CSCuc65609.7.8CVE-2013-1165ciscoasr_1001_firmware+7
EPSS score
1.89%
Cisco IOS XE 2.x and 3.x before 3.4.5S, and 3.5 through 3.7 before 3.7.1S, on 1000 series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (card reload) by sending many crafted L2TP packets, aka Bug ID CSCtz23293.7.1CVE-2013-1167ciscoasr_1001_firmware+8
EPSS score
1.96%
Cisco IOS XE 3.2 through 3.4 before 3.4.2S, and 3.5, on 1000 series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR), when bridge domain interface (BDI) is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (card reload) via packets that are not properly handled during the processing of encapsulation, aka Bug ID CSCtt11558.7.8CVE-2013-1164ciscoasr_1001_firmware+6
EPSS score
1.91%
Cisco IOS XE 3.4 before 3.4.4S, 3.5, and 3.6 on 1000 series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR) does not properly implement the Cisco Multicast Leaf Recycle Elimination (MLRE) feature, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (card reload) via fragmented IPv6 multicast packets, aka Bug ID CSCtz97563.7.8CVE-2013-5546ciscoasr_1001_firmware+6
EPSS score
1.89%
The TCP reassembly feature in Cisco IOS XE 3.7 before 3.7.3S and 3.8 before 3.8.1S on 1000 ASR devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via large TCP packets that are processed by the (1) NAT or (2) ALG component, aka Bug ID CSCud72509.7.8CVE-2013-5543ciscoasr_1001_firmware+6
EPSS score
1.89%
Cisco IOS XE 3.4 before 3.4.2S and 3.5 before 3.5.1S on 1000 ASR devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via malformed ICMP error packets associated with a (1) TCP or (2) UDP session that is under inspection by the Zone-Based Firewall (ZBFW) component, aka Bug ID CSCtt26470.7.8CVE-2013-5547ciscoasr_1001_firmware+6
EPSS score
1.91%
Cisco IOS XE 3.9 before 3.9.2S on 1000 ASR devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) by sending malformed EoGRE packets over (1) IPv4 or (2) IPv6, aka Bug ID CSCuf08269.7.8CVE-2013-5545ciscoasr_1001_firmware+6
EPSS score
1.89%
The PPTP ALG implementation in Cisco IOS XE 3.9 before 3.9.2S on 1000 ASR devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) by sending many PPTP packets over NAT, aka Bug ID CSCuh19936.6.3CVE-2014-2183ciscoasr_1001_firmware+8
EPSS score
1.32%
The L2TP module in Cisco IOS XE 3.10S(.2) and earlier on ASR 1000 routers allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (ESP card reload) via a malformed L2TP packet, aka Bug ID CSCun09973.6.1CVE-2014-3284ciscoasr_1001_firmware+8
EPSS score
1.21%
Cisco IOS XE on ASR1000 devices, when PPPoE termination is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a malformed PPPoE packet, aka Bug ID CSCuo55180.6.1CVE-2012-1366ciscoasr_1001_firmware+9
EPSS score
0.72%
Cisco IOS before 15.1(1)SY on ASR 1000 devices, when Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) tracking is enabled for IPv6, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted MLD packets, aka Bug ID CSCtz28544.6.1CVE-2012-5723ciscoasr_1001_firmware+8
EPSS score
0.71%
Cisco ASR 1000 devices with software before 3.8S, when BDI routing is enabled, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted (1) broadcast or (2) multicast ICMP packets with fragmentation, aka Bug ID CSCub55948.6.8CVE-2012-5017ciscoasr_1001_firmware+7
EPSS score
1.54%
Cisco IOS before 15.1(1)SY1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (device reload) by establishing a VPN session and then sending malformed IKEv2 packets, aka Bug ID CSCub39268.7.2CVE-2019-1649cisco15454-m-wse-k9_firmware+22
EPSS score
0.61%
A vulnerability in the logic that handles access control to one of the hardware components in Cisco's proprietary Secure Boot implementation could allow an authenticated, local attacker to write a modified firmware image to the component. This vulnerability affects multiple Cisco products that support hardware-based Secure Boot functionality. The vulnerability is due to an improper check on the area of code that manages on-premise updates to a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) part of the Secure Boot hardware implementation. An attacker with elevated privileges and access to the underlying operating system that is running on the affected device could exploit this vulnerability by writing a modified firmware image to the FPGA. A successful exploit could either cause the device to become unusable (and require a hardware replacement) or allow tampering with the Secure Boot verification process, which under some circumstances may allow the attacker to install and boot a malicious software image. An attacker will need to fulfill all the following conditions to attempt to exploit this vulnerability: Have privileged administrative access to the device. Be able to access the underlying operating system running on the device; this can be achieved either by using a supported, documented mechanism or by exploiting another vulnerability that would provide an attacker with such access. Develop or have access to a platform-specific exploit. An attacker attempting to exploit this vulnerability across multiple affected platforms would need to research each one of those platforms and then develop a platform-specific exploit. Although the research process could be reused across different platforms, an exploit developed for a given hardware platform is unlikely to work on a different hardware platform.