Cyberark vulnerabilities
38 vulnerabilities
Known vulnerabilities in Cyberark products, newest first, with CVSS severity, EPSS, KEV listings and ransomware use, across 14 products.
Products
14- Endpoint Privilege Manager13 vulnerabilities
- Conjur5 vulnerabilities
- Cyberark Identity Management4 vulnerabilities
- Credential Provider3 vulnerabilities
- Identity2 vulnerabilities
- Password Vault2 vulnerabilities
- Privileged Access Manager2 vulnerabilities
- Conjur Oss Helm Chart1 vulnerabilities
- Conjur Service Broker1 vulnerabilities
- Cyberark Secure Web Sessions Extension1 vulnerabilities
- Enterprise Password Vault1 vulnerabilities
- IDP1 vulnerabilities
- Privileged Session Manager1 vulnerabilities
- Viewfinity1 vulnerabilities
CVE-2018-13052cyberarkendpoint_privilege_manager
EPSS score1.21%
In CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (formerly Viewfinity), Privilege Escalation is possible if the attacker has one process that executes as Admin.CVE-2018-9842cyberarkpassword_vaultEPSS score15.90%
CyberArk Password Vault before 9.7 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by replaying a logon message.CVE-2018-9843cyberarkpassword_vaultEPSS score16.70%
The REST API in CyberArk Password Vault Web Access before 9.9.5 and 10.x before 10.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a serialized .NET object in an Authorization HTTP header.CVE-2018-14894cyberarkendpoint_privilege_managerEPSS score1.93%
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager 10.2.1.603 and earlier allows an attacker (who is able to edit permissions of a file) to bypass intended access restrictions and execute blocked applications.CVE-2018-12903cyberarkendpoint_privilege_managerEPSS score0.64%
In CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (formerly Viewfinity) 10.2.1.603, there is persistent XSS via an account name on the create token screen, the VfManager.asmx SelectAccounts->DisplayName screen, a user's groups in ConfigurationPage, the Dialog Title field, and App Group Name in the Application Group Wizard.CVE-2021-31797cyberarkcredential_providerEPSS score0.34%
The user identification mechanism used by CyberArk Credential Provider prior to 12.1 is susceptible to a local host race condition, leading to password disclosure.CVE-2021-31798cyberarkcredential_providerEPSS score0.44%
The effective key space used to encrypt the cache in CyberArk Credential Provider prior to 12.1 has low entropy, and under certain conditions a local malicious user can obtain the plaintext of cache files.CVE-2021-31796cyberarkcredential_providerEPSS score1.76%
An inadequate encryption vulnerability discovered in CyberArk Credential Provider before 12.1 may lead to Information Disclosure. An attacker may realistically have enough information that the number of possible keys (for a credential file) is only one, and the number is usually not higher than 2^36.CVE-2021-37151cyberarkidentityEPSS score0.85%
CyberArk Identity 21.5.131, when handling an invalid authentication attempt, sometimes reveals whether the username is valid. In certain authentication policy configurations with MFA, the API response length can be used to differentiate between a valid user and an invalid one (aka Username Enumeration). Response differentiation enables attackers to enumerate usernames of valid application users. Attackers can use this information to leverage brute-force and dictionary attacks in order to discover valid account information such as passwords.CVE-2021-44049cyberarkendpoint_privilege_managerEPSS score0.40%
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) through 11.5.3.328 before 2021-12-20 allows a local user to gain elevated privileges via a Trojan horse Procmon64.exe in the user's Temp directory.CVE-2025-13762cyberarkcyberark secure web sessions extensionEPSS score0.14%
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in CyberArk CyberArk Secure Web Sessions Extension on Chrome, Edge allows Denial of Service when trying to starting new SWS sessions.This issue affects CyberArk Secure Web Sessions Extension: before 2.2.30305.CVE-2025-66374cyberarkendpoint_privilege_managerEPSS score0.26%
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Agent through 25.10.0 allows a local user to achieve privilege escalation through policy elevation of an Administration task.CVE-2025-46382cyberarkidpEPSS score0.34%
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized ActorCVE-2025-22274cyberarkendpoint_privilege_managerEPSS score0.48%
It is possible to inject HTML code into the page content using the "content" field in the "Application definition" page.
This issue affects CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown. After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer.CVE-2025-22273cyberarkendpoint_privilege_managerEPSS score0.62%
Application does not limit the number or frequency of user interactions, such as the number of incoming requests. At the "/EPMUI/VfManager.asmx/ChangePassword" endpoint it is possible to perform a brute force attack on the current password in use.
This issue affects CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown. After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer.CVE-2025-22272cyberarkendpoint_privilege_managerEPSS score0.46%
In the "/EPMUI/ModalDlgHandler.ashx?value=showReadonlyDlg" endpoint, it is possible to inject code in the "modalDlgMsgInternal" parameter via POST, which is then executed in the browser. The risk of exploiting vulnerability is reduced due to the required additional bypassing the Content-Security-Policy policy
This issue affects CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown. After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer.CVE-2025-22271cyberarkendpoint_privilege_managerEPSS score0.43%
The application or its infrastructure allows for IP address spoofing by providing its own value in the "X-Forwarded-For" header. Thus, the action logging mechanism in the application loses accountability
This issue affects CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown. After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer.CVE-2025-22270cyberarkendpoint_privilege_managerEPSS score0.64%
An attacker with access to the Administration panel, specifically the "Role Management"
tab, can
inject code by adding a new role in the "name" field. It should be noted, however, that the risk of exploiting vulnerability is reduced due to the
required additional error that allows bypassing the Content-Security-Policy policy, which
mitigates JS code execution while still allowing HTML injection.
This issue affects CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown. After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer.CVE-2025-49827cyberarkconjurEPSS score1.45%
Conjur provides secrets management and application identity for infrastructure. Conjur OSS versions 1.19.5 through 1.22.0 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly known as Conjur Enterprise) 13.1 through 13.5 and 13.6 are vulnerable to bypass of the IAM authenticator. An attacker who can manipulate the headers signed by AWS can take advantage of a malformed regular expression to redirect the authentication validation request that Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted sends to AWS to a malicious server controlled by the attacker. This redirection could result in a bypass of the Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted IAM Authenticator, granting the attacker the permissions granted to the client whose request was manipulated. This issue affects both Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly Conjur Enterprise) and Conjur OSS. Conjur OSS version 1.22.1 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted versions 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 fix the issue.CVE-2025-49829cyberarkconjurEPSS score0.45%
Conjur provides secrets management and application identity for infrastructure. Missing validations in Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted allows authenticated attackers to inject resources into the database and to bypass permission checks. This issue affects Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly Conjur Enterprise) prior to versions 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 and Conjur OSS prior to version 1.22.1. Conjur OSS version 1.22.1 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted versions 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 fix the issue.