Hcl vulnerabilities, page 4

90 vulnerabilities

Known vulnerabilities in Hcl products, newest first, with CVSS severity, EPSS, KEV listings and ransomware use, across 20 products.

3CVE-2025-62312hclaion
EPSS score
0.14%
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where basic authorization tokens are used for authentication. Use of basic authorization mechanisms may expose credentials to potential interception or misuse, especially if not combined with secure transmission practices.
2.7CVE-2025-62345hclbigfix runbookai
EPSS score
0.22%
HCL BigFix RunBookAI is affected by a Continued availability of Less-Secure “Input Text” Vulnerability . A component contains a security weakness in its input handling implementation, increasing the risk of misconfiguration and operational errors.
5.4CVE-2025-62310hclaion
EPSS score
0.05%
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where encryption is not enforced for certain data transmissions or operations. This may expose sensitive information to potential interception or unauthorized access under specific conditions.
5.1CVE-2025-62305hclaion
EPSS score
0.11%
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where certain operations may trigger out-of-band interactions, potentially resulting in unintended disclosure of sensitive information. Such behaviour may allow exposure of data to external systems under specific conditions.
9.8CVE-2025-62319hclunica+2
EPSS score
0.29%
Boolean-Based SQL Injection is a type of blind SQL injection where an attacker manipulates SQL queries by injecting Boolean conditions (TRUE or FALSE) into application input fields. Instead of returning database errors or visible data, the application responds differently depending on whether the injected condition evaluates to true or false. This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary SQL into backend configuration queries executed within the application.
2.6CVE-2025-62309hclaion
EPSS score
0.11%
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where auto-complete functionality is enabled for certain input fields. This may allow sensitive information to be stored in the browser, potentially leading to unintended exposure under specific conditions.
4.3CVE-2025-62347hclhcl icontrol
EPSS score
0.31%
HCL iControl was affected by Improper Input Validation vulnerability. It is vulnerable to unexpected system behavior and potential security bypasses. This was caused by an implementation flaw in an architectural security tactic that fails to properly validate whether the received input matches the expected type.
4.3CVE-2025-62311hclaion
EPSS score
0.08%
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where backend service details may be transmitted over insecure HTTP channels. This may expose sensitive information to potential interception or unauthorized access during transmission under certain conditions
5.4CVE-2025-62313hclaion
EPSS score
0.18%
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where adequate protections against brute-force attempts are not enforced. This may allow repeated authentication attempts, potentially leading to unauthorized access or account compromise under certain conditions.
8.8CVE-2025-31951hclbigfix runbookai
EPSS score
0.25%
HCL BigFix RunBookAI is affected by a Unvalidated Command Input / Potential Command Smuggling vulnerability. A flaw in a component's input handling was identified that could permit unauthorized command execution.
6.5CVE-2025-31985hclbigfix service management (sm)+1
EPSS score
0.16%
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a security misconfiguration due to a missing or insecure “X-Content-Type-Options” header. This could allow browsers to perform MIME-type sniffing, potentially causing malicious content to be interpreted and executed incorrectly.
6.1CVE-2025-31970hcldfxanalytics+1
EPSS score
0.15%
HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Insecure Security Header configuration vulnerability where the Content-Security-Policy does not define strict directives for object-src and base-uri, which could allow an attacker to exploit injection vectors such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
4.6CVE-2025-31983hclbigfix service management (sm)+1
EPSS score
0.12%
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a security misconfiguration vulnerability due to CSP header. This could allow attackers to inject malicious scripts increasing the risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) and potential exposure of sensitive information.
5.3CVE-2025-31975hclbigfix service management (sm)+1
EPSS score
0.17%
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by an Information Disclosure – Server Banner issue was identified. Exposed server banners may reveal software versions and system details, potentially aiding attackers in targeting known vulnerabilities.
5.3CVE-2025-31960hclbigfix service management (sm)+1
EPSS score
0.24%
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is vulnerable to information exposure due to improper error handling within its reporting module. It was observed that supplying an invalid or out-of-range value to the consumer_company parameter during a report-viewing request causes the application to trigger an unhandled exception.
5.4CVE-2025-31984hclbigfix service management (sm)+1
EPSS score
0.14%
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a security misconfiguration due to a missing or insecure “X-Content-Type-Options” header. This could allow browsers to perform MIME-type sniffing, potentially causing malicious content to be interpreted and executed incorrectly.
9.8CVE-2025-31973hclbigfix service management (sm)+1
EPSS score
0.18%
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is susceptible to a Configuration – 'Insecure Use of Base Image Version'. Using outdated or insecure base images may introduce known vulnerabilities, potentially increasing the risk of exploitation in the application environment.
2.7CVE-2025-31966hclsametime+1
EPSS score
0.20%
HCL Sametime is vulnerable to broken server-side validation. While the application performs client-side input checks, these are not enforced by the web server. An attacker can bypass these restrictions by sending manipulated HTTP requests directly to the server.
7.5CVE-2020-14230hclhcl domino+1
EPSS score
1.26%
HCL Domino is susceptible to a Denial of Service vulnerability caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote unauthenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially-crafted email message to hang the server. Versions previous to releases 9.0.1 FP10 IF6, 10.0.1 FP5 and 11.0.1 are affected.
7.5CVE-2020-14234hclhcl domino+1
EPSS score
1.04%
HCL Domino is susceptible to a Denial of Service vulnerability due to improper validation of user-supplied input, potentially giving an attacker the ability to crash the server. Versions previous to release 9.0.1 FP10 IF6 and release 10.0.1 are affected.