Hclsoftware vulnerabilities

96 vulnerabilities

Known vulnerabilities in Hclsoftware products, newest first, with CVSS severity, EPSS, KEV listings and ransomware use, across 39 products.

Products

39
5.4CVE-2026-67165hclsoftwareconnections
EPSS score
0.15%
HCL Connections is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting attack where an attacker may leverage this issue to execute arbitrary script code in the browser of an unsuspecting user which leads to executing malicious script code. This may allow the attacker steal cookie-based authentication credentials and comprise user's account then launch other attacks.
3.5CVE-2025-52603hclsoftwareconnections+1
EPSS score
0.30%
HCL Connections is vulnerable to information disclosure. In a very specific user navigation scenario, this could allow a user to obtain limited information when a single piece of internal metadata is returned in the browser.
3.3CVE-2025-59866hclsoftwaredfmpro for catia+2
EPSS score
0.10%
The HCL DFMPro, DFXAnalytics and DFXServer installers are affected by ‘Insecure file permissions Leading to Privilege Escalation’ vulnerability, which enables any logged-in non-administrative user to overwrite or replace the executable file with a malicious binary.
5.5CVE-2025-59868hclsoftwaretraveler for microsoft outlook+1
EPSS score
0.15%
HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a sensitive data exposure vulnerability which could allow an attacker to exploit application information to then attempt additional attacks and cause unknown behavior in the application.
3.7CVE-2025-62328hclsoftwarenomad server on domino
EPSS score
0.25%
HCL Nomad server on Domino did not configure the frame-ancestors directive in the Content-Security-Policy header by default which could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
3.3CVE-2025-62338hclsoftwarebigfix cloud lifecycle management
EPSS score
0.10%
HCL BigFix Cloud Lifecycle Management is affected by lack of input validation.  This low-level flaw allows unauthorized access and may lead to information exposure.
4.9CVE-2025-62327hclsoftwaredevops deploy+1
EPSS score
0.26%
In HCL DevOps Deploy 8.1.2.0 through 8.1.2.3, a user with LLM configuration privileges may be able to recover a credential previously saved for performing authenticated LLM Queries.
3.7CVE-2025-62341hclsoftwareconnections
EPSS score
0.12%
HCL Connections is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) when an internal server is compromised possibly allowing an attacker to send unauthorized requests in certain scenarios leading to information disclosure or security bypass.
6.1CVE-2025-62326hclsoftwaredigital experience+1
EPSS score
0.18%
HCL Digital Experience is susceptible to stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in the administrative user interface which would require elevated privileges to exploit.
5.3CVE-2025-68833hclsoftwarehcl hive
EPSS score
0.15%
HCL Hive Keycloak IAM Instance is affected by insufficient granularity of access control which could allow an attacker unauthorized access to resources.
7.5CVE-2025-68825hclsoftwarehcl hive
EPSS score
0.23%
HCL Hive is affected by incorrect default permissions which could allow an attacker unauthorized lateral movement, container breakout, and interception of sensitive internal communications.
4.3CVE-2025-31962hclsoftwarebigfix ivr+1
EPSS score
0.18%
Insufficient session expiration in the Web UI authentication component in HCL BigFix IVR version 4.2 allows an authenticated attacker to gain prolonged unauthorized access to protected API endpoints due to excessive expiration periods.
9.8CVE-2025-31991hclsoftwarevelocity+1
EPSS score
0.23%
Rate Limiting for attempting a user login is not being properly enforced, making HCL DevOps Velocity susceptible to brute-force attacks past the unsuccessful login attempt limit.  This vulnerability is fixed in 5.1.7.
3.3CVE-2025-31963hclsoftwarebigfix ivr+1
EPSS score
0.09%
Improper authentication and missing CSRF protection in the local setup interface component in HCL BigFix IVR version 4.2 allows a local attacker to perform unauthorized configuration changes via unauthenticated administrative configuration requests.
6.8CVE-2025-31990hclsoftwarehcl devops velocity
EPSS score
0.29%
Rate limiting for certain API calls is not being enforced, making HCL Velocity vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. An attacker could flood the system with a large number of requests, overwhelming its resources and causing it to become unresponsive to legitimate users. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.1.7.
4.9CVE-2025-31964hclsoftwarebigfix ivr+1
EPSS score
0.35%
Improper service binding configuration in internal service components in HCL BigFix IVR version 4.2 allows a privileged attacker to impact service availability via exposure of administrative services bound to external network interfaces instead of the local authentication interface.
8.2CVE-2025-31958hclsoftwarebigfix service management (sm)+1
EPSS score
0.18%
HCL BigFix Service Management is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling.  HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise when websites route HTTP requests through web servers with inconsistent HTTP parsing. HTTP Smuggling exploits inconsistencies in request parsing between front-end and back-end servers, allowing attackers to bypass security controls and perform attacks like cache poisoning or request hijacking.
5.3CVE-2025-31981hclsoftwarebigfix service management (sm)+1
EPSS score
0.09%
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) Discovery is vulnerable to unenforced encryption due to port 80 (HTTP) being open, allowing unencrypted access.  An attacker with access to the network traffic can sniff packets from the connection and uncover the data.
3.5CVE-2025-15619hclsoftwareconnections
EPSS score
0.16%
HCL Connections contains a broken access control vulnerability that may allow an unauthorized user to view data in a single specific scenario.
6.5CVE-2025-15633hclsoftwarebigfix webui+21
EPSS score
0.22%
An improper authorization vulnerability in HCL BigFix WebUI allows an authenticated user without Master Operator privileges to access internal data (site names, versions, and configuration variables) and bypass privilege requirements via unprotected endpoints lacking adequate security headers.