IBM I vulnerabilities, page 4

220 vulnerabilities

Known vulnerabilities in IBM I, newest first, with CVSS severity, EPSS, KEV listings, ransomware use and the affected versions.

6.1CVE-2019-4040ibmi
EPSS score
1.32%
IBM I 7.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 156164.
9.9CVE-2026-16860ibmi
EPSS score
0.75%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an uncontrolled search path element.
4.3CVE-2026-16941ibmi
EPSS score
0.22%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, and 7.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify certain system messages due to improper authorization.
6.5CVE-2026-16929ibmi
EPSS score
0.44%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a buffer overflow.
7.5CVE-2026-16931ibmi
EPSS score
0.55%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper handling of zero-length TCP options.
6.5CVE-2026-16878ibmi
EPSS score
0.41%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an out-of-bounds read.
6.5CVE-2026-16692ibmi
EPSS score
0.50%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
7.8CVE-2026-16826ibmi
EPSS score
0.13%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
4.9CVE-2026-16693ibmi
EPSS score
0.13%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of hardcoded cryptographic constants to obfuscate encryption keys.
8.8CVE-2026-16906ibmi
EPSS score
0.79%
IBM i 7.6, and 7.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
7.6CVE-2026-16907ibmi
EPSS score
0.57%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper bounds checking.
7.8CVE-2026-16898ibmi
EPSS score
0.15%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local authenticated attacker to change the ownership of arbitrary files due to improper validation of an attacker-controlled file path.
4.3CVE-2026-16871ibmi
EPSS score
0.36%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a heap buffer overflow.
7.5CVE-2026-16887ibmi
EPSS score
0.55%
IBM i 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to an out-of-bounds write.
5.4CVE-2026-16892ibmi
EPSS score
0.25%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication during service-name matching.
8.8CVE-2026-16856ibmi
EPSS score
0.50%
IBM i 7.6, and 7.5 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
9.1CVE-2026-16815ibmi
EPSS score
0.46%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service and potentially obtain sensitive information due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
7.1CVE-2026-16896ibmi
EPSS score
0.10%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local authenticated attacker to obtain unauthorized access to files due to a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition.
8.8CVE-2026-16908ibmi
EPSS score
0.58%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to arbitrary objects due to a path traversal vulnerability.
9.8CVE-2026-16867ibmi
EPSS score
0.62%
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to access server resources with the privileges of an authenticated user due to improper authentication during NTLM session negotiation.