Redhat Cloudforms vulnerabilities, page 2
49 vulnerabilities
Known vulnerabilities in Redhat Cloudforms, newest first, with CVSS severity, EPSS, KEV listings, ransomware use and the affected versions.
CVE-2020-14369redhatcloudforms+1
EPSS score0.34%
This release fixes a Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability was found in Red Hat CloudForms which forces end users to execute unwanted actions on a web application in which the user is currently authenticated. An attacker can make a forgery HTTP request to the server by crafting custom flash file which can force the user to perform state changing requests like provisioning VMs, running ansible playbooks and so forth.CVE-2020-14325redhatcloudformsEPSS score1.09%
Red Hat CloudForms before 5.11.7.0 was vulnerable to the User Impersonation authorization flaw which allows malicious attacker to create existent and non-existent role-based access control user, with groups and roles. With a selected group of EvmGroup-super_administrator, an attacker can perform any API request as a super administrator.CVE-2020-25716redhatcloudforms+8EPSS score0.77%
A flaw was found in Cloudforms. A role-based privileges escalation flaw where export or import of administrator files is possible. An attacker with a specific group can perform actions restricted only to system administrator. This is the affect of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-10783. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity. Versions before cfme 5.11.10.1 are affectedCVE-2020-10778redhatcloudformsEPSS score0.88%
In Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5, the read only widgets can be edited by inspecting the forms and dropping the disabled attribute from the fields since there is no server-side validation. This business logic flaw violate the expected behavior.CVE-2020-10779redhatcloudformsEPSS score0.78%
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 leads to insecure direct object references (IDOR) and functional level access control bypass due to missing privilege check. Therefore, if an attacker knows the right criteria, it is possible to access some sensitive data within the CloudForms.CVE-2020-10777redhatcloudformsEPSS score0.66%
A cross-site scripting flaw was found in Report Menu feature of Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5. An attacker could use this flaw to execute a stored XSS attack on an application administrator using CloudForms.CVE-2020-10783redhatcloudformsEPSS score1.00%
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 is affected by a role-based privilege escalation flaw. An attacker with EVM-Operator group can perform actions restricted only to EVM-Super-administrator group, leads to, exporting or importing administrator files.CVE-2014-0057redhatcloudforms+1EPSS score1.59%
The x_button method in the ServiceController (vmdb/app/controllers/service_controller.rb) in Red Hat CloudForms 3.0 Management Engine 5.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary methods via unspecified vectors.CVE-2014-0197cfmecfme+2EPSS score0.68%
CFME: CSRF protection vulnerability via permissive check of the referrer headerCVE-2014-0081debianrails+8EPSS score4.03%
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in actionview/lib/action_view/helpers/number_helper.rb in Ruby on Rails before 3.2.17, 4.0.x before 4.0.3, and 4.1.x before 4.1.0.beta2 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) format, (2) negative_format, or (3) units parameter to the (a) number_to_currency, (b) number_to_percentage, or (c) number_to_human helper.CVE-2012-4574redhatcloudformsEPSS score0.36%
Pulp in Red Hat CloudForms before 1.1 uses world-readable permissions for pulp.conf, which allows local users to read the administrative password by reading this file.CVE-2012-5605redhatcloudformsEPSS score0.36%
Grinder in Red Hat CloudForms before 1.1 uses world-writable permissions for /var/lib/pulp/cache/grinder/, which allows local users to modify grinder cache files.CVE-2012-5604RubyGemsldap_fluff+1EPSS score1.75%
The ldap_fluff gem for Ruby, as used in Red Hat CloudForms 1.1, when using Active Directory for authentication, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via unspecified vectors.CVE-2012-5603redhatcloudformsEPSS score1.04%
proxies_controller.rb in Katello in Red Hat CloudForms before 1.1 does not properly check permissions, which allows remote authenticated users to read consumer certificates or change arbitrary users' settings via unspecified vectors related to the "consumer UUID" of a system.CVE-2012-3538redhatcloudformsEPSS score0.64%
Pulp in Red Hat CloudForms before 1.1 logs administrative passwords in a world-readable file, which allows local users to read pulp administrative passwords by reading production.log.CVE-2017-2664red hatcloudforms+10EPSS score1.30%
CloudForms Management Engine (cfme) before 5.7.3 and 5.8.x before 5.8.1 lacks RBAC controls on certain methods in the rails application portion of CloudForms. An attacker with access could use a variety of methods within the rails application portion of CloudForms to escalate privileges.CVE-2017-2653red hatcloudforms+7EPSS score1.39%
A number of unused delete routes are present in CloudForms before 5.7.2.1 which can be accessed via GET requests instead of just POST requests. This could allow an attacker to bypass the protect_from_forgery XSRF protection causing the routes to be used. This attack would require additional cross-site scripting or similar attacks in order to execute.CVE-2017-2632red hatcfme+2EPSS score1.45%
A logic error in valid_role() in CloudForms role validation before 5.7.1.3 could allow a tenant administrator to create groups with a higher privilege level than the tenant administrator should have. This would allow an attacker with tenant administration access to elevate privileges.CVE-2017-2639redhatcloudforms+2EPSS score1.12%
It was found that CloudForms does not verify that the server hostname matches the domain name in the certificate when using a custom CA and communicating with Red Hat Virtualization (RHEV) and OpenShift. This would allow an attacker to spoof RHEV or OpenShift systems and potentially harvest sensitive information from CloudForms.CVE-2017-11610alpinesupervisor+9EPSS score87.38%
The XML-RPC server in supervisor before 3.0.1, 3.1.x before 3.1.4, 3.2.x before 3.2.4, and 3.3.x before 3.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted XML-RPC request, related to nested supervisord namespace lookups.