CveMateVulnerability intelligence

Stormshield vulnerabilities, page 3

63 vulnerabilities

Known vulnerabilities in Stormshield products, newest first, with CVSS severity, EPSS, KEV listings and ransomware use, across 6 products.

CVE-2022-32215alpinenodejs+114y ago14-07-2022 00:00

The llhttp parser <v14.20.1, <v16.17.1 and <v18.9.1 in the http module in Node.js does not correctly handle multi-line Transfer-Encoding headers. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS).CVE-2022-32214alpinenodejs+104y ago14-07-2022 00:00

The llhttp parser <v14.20.1, <v16.17.1 and <v18.9.1 in the http module in Node.js does not strictly use the CRLF sequence to delimit HTTP requests. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS).CVE-2022-30279stormshieldstormshield network security4y ago12-05-2022 14:49

An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 4.3.x before 4.3.8. The event logging of the ASQ sofbus lacbus plugin triggers the dereferencing of a NULL pointer, leading to a crash of SNS. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability via forged sofbus lacbus traffic to cause a firmware crash.CVE-2022-23989stormshieldstormshield network security4y ago15-03-2022 20:26

In Stormshield Network Security (SNS) before 3.7.25, 3.8.x through 3.11.x before 3.11.13, 4.x before 4.2.10, and 4.3.x before 4.3.5, a flood of connections to the SSLVPN service might lead to saturation of the loopback interface. This could result in the blocking of almost all network traffic, making the firewall unreachable. An attacker could exploit this via forged and properly timed traffic to cause a denial of service.CVE-2002-20001balasysdheater+304y ago11-11-2021 00:00

The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE.CVE-2026-14466stormshieldstormshield network security1mo ago04-09-2026 14:27

It’s possible to run a stored XSS in Stormshield’s web administration panel. To exploit this vulnerability, a SNS administrator with appropriate permissions must inject some malicious script in a group’s comments in the webservices administration interface.CVE-2026-8482stormshieldstormshield network security3mo ago02-07-2026 08:42

A vulnerability was discovered on StormShield Network Security 4.3.0 to 4.3.41 (included), 4.8.0 to 4.8.15 (included) , 5.0.0 to 5.0.5 (included) There is a possible leak of secret information if administration commands have been passed with the CLI command line tool. Someone with SSH access to the firewall (if SSH multiuser mode is enabled) could possibly get the proxy CA passphrase or TPM password.CVE-2026-8480stormshieldstormshield network security3mo ago01-07-2026 14:52

A vulnerability was discovered on Stormshield Network Security 4.3.0 to 4.3.41 (included), 4.4.0 to 4.8.15 (included) , 5.0.2 EA to 5.0.5 (included) A revoked client certificate can still be used to authenticate to the captive‑admin portal, allowing an attacker who possesses the revoked certificate to gain administrative access.CVE-2026-8474stormshieldstormshield network security4mo ago01-06-2026 07:47

A vulnerability was discovered on Stormshield Network Security * 4.3.0 to 4.3.41, * 4.8.0 to 4.8.15, * 5.0.0 to 5.0.5 It is possible to execute a reflected XSS attack on the login API available on Stormshield SNS appliance by executing a script on the victim's machine. The risks include the theft of cookies or other sensitive data, as well as the modification of page behavior, for example, by redirecting the victim to malicious websites.CVE-2023-41165stormshieldstormshield network security2y ago25-12-2023 00:00

An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 3.7.0 through 3.7.38 before 3.7.39, 3.10.0 through 3.11.26 before 3.11.27, 4.0 through 4.3.21 before 4.3.22, and 4.4.0 through 4.6.8 before 4.6.9. An administrator with write access to the SNS firewall can configure a login disclaimer with malicious JavaScript elements that can result in data theft.CVE-2023-41166stormshieldstormshield network security2y ago20-12-2023 00:00

An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 3.7.0 through 3.7.39, 3.11.0 through 3.11.27, 4.3.0 through 4.3.22, 4.6.0 through 4.6.9, and 4.7.0 through 4.7.1. It's possible to know if a specific user account exists on the SNS firewall by using remote access commands.CVE-2023-26095stormshieldstormshield network security3y ago28-08-2023 00:00

ASQ in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 4.3.15 before 4.3.16 and 4.6.x before 4.6.3 allows a crash when analysing a crafted SIP packet.CVE-2023-47091stormshieldstormshield network security2y ago25-12-2023 00:00

An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) SNS 4.3.13 through 4.3.22 before 4.3.23, SNS 4.6.0 through 4.6.9 before 4.6.10, and SNS 4.7.0 through 4.7.1 before 4.7.2. An attacker can overflow the cookie threshold, making an IPsec connection impossible.CVE-2023-47093stormshieldstormshield network security2y ago20-12-2023 00:00

An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 4.0.0 through 4.3.21, 4.4.0 through 4.6.8, and 4.7.0. Sending a crafted ICMP packet may lead to a crash of the ASQ engine.CVE-2023-20052ciscocisco secure endpoint+63y ago16-02-2023 15:26

On Feb 15, 2023, the following vulnerability in the ClamAV scanning library was disclosed: A vulnerability in the DMG file parser of ClamAV versions 1.0.0 and earlier, 0.105.1 and earlier, and 0.103.7 and earlier could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access sensitive information on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to enabling XML entity substitution that may result in XML external entity injection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted DMG file to be scanned by ClamAV on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to leak bytes from any file that may be read by the ClamAV scanning process.CVE-2023-20032ciscocisco secure endpoint+93y ago16-02-2023 15:24

On Feb 15, 2023, the following vulnerability in the ClamAV scanning library was disclosed: A vulnerability in the HFS+ partition file parser of ClamAV versions 1.0.0 and earlier, 0.105.1 and earlier, and 0.103.7 and earlier could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability is due to a missing buffer size check that may result in a heap buffer overflow write. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted HFS+ partition file to be scanned by ClamAV on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the ClamAV scanning process, or else crash the process, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. For a description of this vulnerability, see the ClamAV blog ["https://blog.clamav.net/"].CVE-2023-0215alpineopenssl+143y ago08-02-2023 19:03

The public API function BIO_new_NDEF is a helper function used for streaming ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally to OpenSSL to support the SMIME, CMS and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but may also be called directly by end user applications. The function receives a BIO from the caller, prepends a new BIO_f_asn1 filter BIO onto the front of it to form a BIO chain, and then returns the new head of the BIO chain to the caller. Under certain conditions, for example if a CMS recipient public key is invalid, the new filter BIO is freed and the function returns a NULL result indicating a failure. However, in this case, the BIO chain is not properly cleaned up and the BIO passed by the caller still retains internal pointers to the previously freed filter BIO. If the caller then goes on to call BIO_pop() on the BIO then a use-after-free will occur. This will most likely result in a crash. This scenario occurs directly in the internal function B64_write_ASN1() which may cause BIO_new_NDEF() to be called and will subsequently call BIO_pop() on the BIO. This internal function is in turn called by the public API functions PEM_write_bio_ASN1_stream, PEM_write_bio_CMS_stream, PEM_write_bio_PKCS7_stream, SMIME_write_ASN1, SMIME_write_CMS and SMIME_write_PKCS7. Other public API functions that may be impacted by this include i2d_ASN1_bio_stream, BIO_new_CMS, BIO_new_PKCS7, i2d_CMS_bio_stream and i2d_PKCS7_bio_stream. The OpenSSL cms and smime command line applications are similarly affected.CVE-2023-0216alpineopenssl+113y ago08-02-2023 19:03

An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to load malformed PKCS7 data with the d2i_PKCS7(), d2i_PKCS7_bio() or d2i_PKCS7_fp() functions. The result of the dereference is an application crash which could lead to a denial of service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function however third party applications might call these functions on untrusted data.CVE-2023-0286alpineopenssl+393y ago08-02-2023 19:01

There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial of service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only affect applications which have implemented their own functionality for retrieving CRLs over a network.CVE-2023-0401alpineopenssl+123y ago08-02-2023 19:00

A NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being verified on PKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash algorithm used for the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but the implementation of the hash algorithm is not available the digest initialization will fail. There is a missing check for the return value from the initialization function which later leads to invalid usage of the digest API most likely leading to a crash. The unavailability of an algorithm can be caused by using FIPS enabled configuration of providers or more commonly by not loading the legacy provider. PKCS7 data is processed by the SMIME library calls and also by the time stamp (TS) library calls. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call these functions however third party applications would be affected if they call these functions to verify signatures on untrusted data.