6.2

CVE-2023-52925: netfilter: nf_tables: don't fail inserts if duplicate has expired

Analyzed
AliasesUBUNTU-CVE-2023-52925DEBIAN-CVE-2023-52925
Published 05-02-2025Last modified 23-05-2026

Vulnerability summary

CVE-2023-52925 is a medium (CVSS 6.2) vulnerability in linux. EPSS estimates a 0.21% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 10.8% of scored vulnerabilities.

Priority
Routine

Not severe (CVSS 6.2, local access); no exploitation reported by the 5 checked sources

Source freshness unavailable

How is this decided?
CVSS score
6.2/10
010
Medium · v3.1 (CVE.org)
EPSS score
0.21%
0%100%
Low · 0.00 pp in 30 days
KEVNot listedNot listed by any tracked catalog.
RansomwareNot flaggedNo ransomware use recorded.
Public exploits0No public exploits recorded

Advisory lineage

Upstream 0 · Downstream 12 · Related 12

Timeline

  1. 05-02-2025
    PublishedVulnerability first disclosed.
  2. 23-05-2026
    Last modifiedVulnerability information updated.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: don't fail inserts if duplicate has expired nftables selftests fail: run-tests.sh testcases/sets/0044interval_overlap_0 Expected: 0-2 . 0-3, got: W: [FAILED] ./testcases/sets/0044interval_overlap_0: got 1 Insertion must ignore duplicate but expired entries. Moreover, there is a strange asymmetry in nft_pipapo_activate: It refetches the current element, whereas the other ->activate callbacks (bitmap, hash, rhash, rbtree) use elem->priv. Same for .remove: other set implementations take elem->priv, nft_pipapo_remove fetches elem->priv, then does a relookup, remove this. I suspect this was the reason for the change that prompted the removal of the expired check in pipapo_get() in the first place, but skipping exired elements there makes no sense to me, this helper is used for normal get requests, insertions (duplicate check) and deactivate callback. In first two cases expired elements must be skipped. For ->deactivate(), this gets called for DELSETELEM, so it seems to me that expired elements should be skipped as well, i.e. delete request should fail with -ENOENT error.

CVSS metrics

5 scores · 4 sources · 2 versions

EPSS trend

Probability

0.21%

Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

Percentile

11%

Versus all other CVEs

30-day change

No change 0.00 pp

From 0.21% on 04-10-2026

04-10-202603-11-2026

Known exploited

Compare KEV catalogs
CISA KEV

Not in the CISA KEV catalog.

ENISA CNW

Not in the ENISA CNW catalog.

CIRCL

Not in the CIRCL catalog.

Public exploits

0 found

No public exploits indexed.

Weaknesses

CWE · root cause

No weakness data has been published for this record.

Affected systems

Version check

Known conditions: local access, no authentication, no user interaction (CVSS vector). Other conditions: not stated in public data.

Ubuntu97 products
  • linuxAll versions (No fix recorded)
  • linux-allwinner-5.19All versions (No fix recorded)
  • linux-awsAll versions (No fix recorded)
  • linux-aws-5.0All versions (No fix recorded)
  • linux-aws-5.11All versions (No fix recorded)
Linux2 products
  • linux≥ b15ea4017af82011dd55225ce77cce3d4dfc169c, < 891ca5dfe3b718b441fc786014a7ba8f517da188 | ≥ 7c7e658a36f8b1522bd3586d8137e5f93a25ddc5, < af78b0489e8898a8c9449ffc0fdd2e181916f0d4 | ≥ 59dab3bf0b8fc08eb802721c0532f13dd89209b8, < 59ee68c437c562170265194a99698c805a686bb3 | ≥ bd156ce9553dcaf2d6ee2c825d1a5a1718e86524, < 156369a702c33ad5434a19c3a689bfb836d4e0b8 | ≥ 24138933b97b055d486e8064b4a1721702442a9b, < 7845914f45f066497ac75b30c50dbc735e84e884 | 94313a196b44184b5b52c1876da6a537701b425a | 1da4874d05da1526b11b82fc7f3c7ac38749ddf8 | ≥ 4.19.316, < 4.20 | ≥ 5.4.262, < 5.5 | ≥ 6.4.11, < 6.4.12
  • linux_kernelEOL≥ 4.19.316, < 4.20 | ≥ 5.4.262, < 5.5 | 6.4.11 | 6.5:rc6
Debian1 product
  • linux< 6.4.13-1

3 vendors · 100 products

References

9 links