CVE-2023-5363: Incorrect cipher key & IV length processing
Vulnerability summary
CVE-2023-5363 is a high (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in debian debian_linux. EPSS estimates a 3.94% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 90.4% of scored vulnerabilities.
Severe, CVSS 7.5 (CVE.org); no exploitation reported by the 5 checked sources; EPSS 4% (FIRST, 03-11-2026)
Source freshness unavailable
How is this decided?Advisory lineage
Upstream 0 · Downstream 3 · Related 7Timeline
- 24-10-2023PublishedVulnerability first disclosed.
- 14-10-2026Last modifiedVulnerability information updated.
Description
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers. Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes. When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB. For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse. Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical. Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary. OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
CVSS metrics
8 scores · 8 sources · 1 version- OSV · AlpineEcosystem advisory · calculated7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- OSV · Red hatEcosystem advisory · calculated7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- OSV · UbuntuEcosystem advisory · calculated7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- OSV · DebianEcosystem advisory · calculated7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- OSV · WolfiEcosystem advisory · calculated7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- OSV · ChainguardEcosystem advisory · calculated7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- NVDNIST7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS trend
Probability
3.94%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days
Percentile
90%
Versus all other CVEs
30-day change
Increase +0.61 pp
From 3.33% on 04-10-2026
Known exploited
Compare KEV catalogsNot in the CISA KEV catalog.
Not in the ENISA CNW catalog.
Not in the CIRCL catalog.
Public exploits
0 foundNo public exploits indexed.
Weaknesses
CWE · root causeAffected systems
Known conditions: network-reachable, no authentication, no user interaction (CVSS vector). Other conditions: not stated in public data.
Redhat7 products
- openssl< 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | < 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2
- openssl-debuginfo< 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | < 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2
- openssl-debugsource< 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | < 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2
- openssl-devel< 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | < 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2
- openssl-libs< 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | < 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2
Netapp5 products
Chainguard4 products
- openssl< 3.1.4-r0
- openssl-provider-fipsAll versions (No fix recorded)
- openssl-provider-fips-3.1.2All versions (No fix recorded)
- ruby-3.2All versions (No fix recorded)
Debian2 products
- openssl< 3.0.11-1~deb12u2 | < 3.0.12-1
- debian_linux12.0
Mageia2 products
- openssl< 3.0.12-1.mga9
- quictls< 3.0.12-1.mga9
Ubuntu2 products
- nodejsAll versions (No fix recorded)
- openssl< 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.12 | < 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.12+Fips1 | < 3.0.10-1ubuntu2.1
Wolfi2 products
- openssl< 3.1.4-r0
- ruby-3.2All versions (No fix recorded)
Alpine1 product
- openssl≥ 3.0.0, < 3.0.12-r0 | ≥ 3.0.0, < 3.1.4-r0
Openssl1 product
- openssl≥ 3.0.0, < 3.0.12 | ≥ 3.1.0, < 3.1.4
Opensuse1 product
- openssl-3&distro=openSUSE Tumbleweed< 3.1.4-1.1
10 vendors · 27 products
References
36 links- git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0df40630850fb2740e6be6890bb905d3fc623b2dPatchFIXMailing ListThird Party Advisory