7.5

CVE-2024-27435: nvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation

Modified
AliasesUBUNTU-CVE-2024-27435DEBIAN-CVE-2024-27435
Published 17-05-2024Last modified 05-08-2026

Vulnerability summary

CVE-2024-27435 is a high (CVSS 7.5) Improper Locking vulnerability in linux. EPSS estimates a 0.40% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 34% of scored vulnerabilities.

Priority
Prioritisesevere

Severe, CVSS 7.5 (CVE.org); no exploitation reported by the 5 checked sources; EPSS 0% (FIRST, 03-11-2026)

Source freshness unavailable

How is this decided?
CVSS score
7.5/10
010
High · v3.1 (CVE.org)
EPSS score
0.40%
0%100%
Low · 0.00 pp in 30 days
KEVNot listedNot listed by any tracked catalog.
RansomwareNot flaggedNo ransomware use recorded.
Public exploits0No public exploits recorded

Advisory lineage

Upstream 0 · Downstream 16 · Related 15

Timeline

  1. 17-05-2024
    PublishedVulnerability first disclosed.
  2. 05-08-2026
    Last modifiedVulnerability information updated.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation We found a issue on production environment while using NVMe over RDMA, admin_q reconnect failed forever while remote target and network is ok. After dig into it, we found it may caused by a ABBA deadlock due to tag allocation. In my case, the tag was hold by a keep alive request waiting inside admin_q, as we quiesced admin_q while reset ctrl, so the request maked as idle and will not process before reset success. As fabric_q shares tagset with admin_q, while reconnect remote target, we need a tag for connect command, but the only one reserved tag was held by keep alive command which waiting inside admin_q. As a result, we failed to reconnect admin_q forever. In order to fix this issue, I think we should keep two reserved tags for admin queue.

CVSS metrics

4 scores · 4 sources · 1 version

EPSS trend

Probability

0.40%

Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

Percentile

34%

Versus all other CVEs

30-day change

No change 0.00 pp

From 0.40% on 04-10-2026

04-10-202603-11-2026

Known exploited

Compare KEV catalogs
CISA KEV

Not in the CISA KEV catalog.

ENISA CNW

Not in the ENISA CNW catalog.

CIRCL

Not in the CIRCL catalog.

Public exploits

0 found

No public exploits indexed.

Weaknesses

CWE · root cause

Affected systems

Version check

Known conditions: network-reachable, no authentication, no user interaction (CVSS vector). Other conditions: not stated in public data.

Ubuntu106 products
  • linuxAll versions (No fix recorded) | < 6.8.0-35.35
  • linux-allwinner-5.19All versions (No fix recorded)
  • linux-awsAll versions (No fix recorded) | < 6.8.0-1009.9
  • linux-aws-5.0All versions (No fix recorded)
  • linux-aws-5.11All versions (No fix recorded)
Linux2 products
  • linux≥ ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae, < 149afee5c7418ec5db9d7387b9c9a5c1eb7ea2a8 | ≥ ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae, < ff2f90f88d78559802466ad1c84ac5bda4416b3a | ≥ ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae, < 6851778504cdb49431809b4ba061903d5f592c96 | ≥ ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae, < 262da920896e2f2ab0e3947d9dbee0aa09045818 | ≥ ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae, < de105068fead55ed5c07ade75e9c8e7f86a00d1d | 5.12
  • linux_kernelEOL≥ 5.12.1, < 6.1.83 | ≥ 6.2, < 6.6.23 | ≥ 6.7, < 6.7.11 | ≥ 6.8, < 6.8.2 | 5.12 | 5.12:rc4 | 5.12:rc5 | 5.12:rc6 | 5.12:rc7 | 5.12:rc8
Debian1 product
  • linux< 6.1.85-1 | < 6.7.12-1

3 vendors · 109 products

References

15 links
Show all 15 references