CVE-2024-29018: External DNS requests from 'internal' networks could lead to data exfiltration
Vulnerability summary
CVE-2024-29018 is a high (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in moby. EPSS estimates a 0.74% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 54.8% of scored vulnerabilities.
Not severe (CVSS 5.9, network access); no exploitation reported by the 5 checked sources
Source freshness unavailable
How is this decided?Advisory lineage
Upstream 0 · Downstream 12 · Related 59Timeline
- 20-03-2024PublishedVulnerability first disclosed.
- 13-08-2024Last modifiedVulnerability information updated.
Description
Moby is an open source container framework that is a key component of Docker Engine, Docker Desktop, and other distributions of container tooling or runtimes. Moby's networking implementation allows for many networks, each with their own IP address range and gateway, to be defined. This feature is frequently referred to as custom networks, as each network can have a different driver, set of parameters and thus behaviors. When creating a network, the `--internal` flag is used to designate a network as _internal_. The `internal` attribute in a docker-compose.yml file may also be used to mark a network _internal_, and other API clients may specify the `internal` parameter as well. When containers with networking are created, they are assigned unique network interfaces and IP addresses. The host serves as a router for non-internal networks, with a gateway IP that provides SNAT/DNAT to/from container IPs. Containers on an internal network may communicate between each other, but are precluded from communicating with any networks the host has access to (LAN or WAN) as no default route is configured, and firewall rules are set up to drop all outgoing traffic. Communication with the gateway IP address (and thus appropriately configured host services) is possible, and the host may communicate with any container IP directly. In addition to configuring the Linux kernel's various networking features to enable container networking, `dockerd` directly provides some services to container networks. Principal among these is serving as a resolver, enabling service discovery, and resolution of names from an upstream resolver. When a DNS request for a name that does not correspond to a container is received, the request is forwarded to the configured upstream resolver. This request is made from the container's network namespace: the level of access and routing of traffic is the same as if the request was made by the container itself. As a consequence of this design, containers solely attached to an internal network will be unable to resolve names using the upstream resolver, as the container itself is unable to communicate with that nameserver. Only the names of containers also attached to the internal network are able to be resolved. Many systems run a local forwarding DNS resolver. As the host and any containers have separate loopback devices, a consequence of the design described above is that containers are unable to resolve names from the host's configured resolver, as they cannot reach these addresses on the host loopback device. To bridge this gap, and to allow containers to properly resolve names even when a local forwarding resolver is used on a loopback address, `dockerd` detects this scenario and instead forward DNS requests from the host namework namespace. The loopback resolver then forwards the requests to its configured upstream resolvers, as expected. Because `dockerd` forwards DNS requests to the host loopback device, bypassing the container network namespace's normal routing semantics entirely, internal networks can unexpectedly forward DNS requests to an external nameserver. By registering a domain for which they control the authoritative nameservers, an attacker could arrange for a compromised container to exfiltrate data by encoding it in DNS queries that will eventually be answered by their nameservers. Docker Desktop is not affected, as Docker Desktop always runs an internal resolver on a RFC 1918 address. Moby releases 26.0.0, 25.0.4, and 23.0.11 are patched to prevent forwarding any DNS requests from internal networks. As a workaround, run containers intended to be solely attached to internal networks with a custom upstream address, which will force all upstream DNS queries to be resolved from the container's network namespace.
CVSS metrics
8 scores · 8 sources · 1 version- CVE.orgCNA5.9MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NDiffers
- OSV · UbuntuEcosystem advisory · calculated7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- OSV · DebianEcosystem advisory · calculated7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- OSV · WolfiEcosystem advisory · calculated5.9MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NDiffers
- OSV · GoEcosystem advisory · calculated5.9MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NDiffers
- OSV · ChainguardEcosystem advisory · calculated5.9MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NDiffers
- OSV · AlpineEcosystem advisory · calculated7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS trend
Probability
0.74%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days
Percentile
55%
Versus all other CVEs
30-day change
Decrease -0.01 pp
From 0.75% on 04-10-2026
Known exploited
Compare KEV catalogsNot in the CISA KEV catalog.
Not in the ENISA CNW catalog.
Not in the CIRCL catalog.
Public exploits
0 foundNo public exploits indexed.
Weaknesses
CWE · root causeAffected systems
Known conditions: network-reachable, no authentication, no user interaction (CVSS vector). Other conditions: not stated in public data.
Chainguard53 products
- aactl< 0.4.12-r7
- buf< 1.30.1-r0
- buildctl< 0.13.1-r1
- buildkitd< 0.13.1-r1
- cadvisor< 0.49.1-r4
Wolfi38 products
- aactl< 0.4.12-r7
- buf< 1.30.1-r0
- buildctl< 0.13.1-r1
- buildkitd< 0.13.1-r1
- cadvisor< 0.49.1-r4
Suse7 products
- docker&distro=SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1< 27.5.1_ce-150000.215.3
- docker&distro=SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2< 27.5.1_ce-150000.215.3
- docker&distro=SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3< 27.5.1_ce-150000.215.3
- docker&distro=SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4< 27.5.1_ce-150000.215.3
- docker&distro=SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5< 27.5.1_ce-150000.215.3
Opensuse2 products
- docker&distro=openSUSE Leap 15.6< 27.5.1_ce-150000.215.3
- docker&distro=openSUSE Tumbleweed< 27.4.1_ce-12.1
Ubuntu2 products
- docker.io< 18.09.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.9+esm2 | < 20.10.21-0ubuntu1~18.04.3+esm2 | All versions (No fix recorded)
- docker.io-app< 26.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.1+esm1 | < 27.5.1-0ubuntu3~22.04.2 | < 26.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1+esm1 | < 27.5.1-0ubuntu3~24.04.2 | < 26.1.3-0ubuntu1~24.04.1+esm1
Alpine1 product
- docker< 25.0.2-r0 | < 25.0.5-r0 | < 26.0.0-r0
Debian1 product
- docker.ioAll versions (No fix recorded) | < 26.1.4+dfsg1-9
Github.com/docker1 product
- docker≥ 26.0.0-rc1, < 26.0.0-rc3 | ≥ 25.0.0, < 25.0.5 | < 23.0.11 | ≥ 26.0.0-rc1+incompatible, < 26.0.0-rc3+incompatible
Mageia1 product
- docker< 25.0.7-1.mga9
Moby1 product
- moby≥ 26.0.0-rc1, < 26.0.0-rc3 | ≥ 25.0.0, < 25.0.5 | < 23.0.11
Mobyproject1 product
- moby< 23.0.11 | ≥ 24.0.0, < 25.0.5 | 26.0.0:rc1 | 26.0.0:rc2 | 26.0.0:rc3
11 vendors · 108 products
References
20 links- github.com/moby/moby/security/advisories/GHSA-mq39-4gv4-mvpxX Refsource CONFIRMAdvisoryREPORTWEBVendor Advisory
Show all 20 references
- github.com/moby/mobyPACKAGE
- lists.opensuse.org/archives/…Advisory