4.7

CVE-2026-43420: linux

CVSS: 4.7v3.1MediumAnalyzed
AliasesUBUNTU-CVE-2026-43420DEBIAN-CVE-2026-43420
Published 08-05-2026Last modified 11-05-2026

Vulnerability summary

CVE-2026-43420 is a medium (CVSS 4.7) vulnerability in linux. EPSS estimates a 0.11% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 1.2% of scored vulnerabilities.

Overall risk
19/100
0100
Low · default modelHow is this calculated?
CVSS score
4.7/10
010
Medium · v3.1 (NVD)
EPSS score
0.11%
0%100%
Low · +0.02 pp in 30 days
KEVNot listedIn no KEV catalog
RansomwareNone recordedNo known use recorded
Public exploits0No public exploits recorded

Advisory lineage

Upstream 0 · Downstream 33 · Related 33

Timeline

  1. 08-05-2026
    PublishedVulnerability first disclosed.
  2. 11-05-2026
    Last modifiedVulnerability information updated.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: fix i_nlink underrun during async unlink During async unlink, we drop the `i_nlink` counter before we receive the completion (that will eventually update the `i_nlink`) because "we assume that the unlink will succeed". That is not a bad idea, but it races against deletions by other clients (or against the completion of our own unlink) and can lead to an underrun which emits a WARNING like this one: WARNING: CPU: 85 PID: 25093 at fs/inode.c:407 drop_nlink+0x50/0x68 Modules linked in: CPU: 85 UID: 3221252029 PID: 25093 Comm: php-cgi8.1 Not tainted 6.14.11-cm4all1-ampere #655 Hardware name: Supermicro ARS-110M-NR/R12SPD-A, BIOS 1.1b 10/17/2023 pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : drop_nlink+0x50/0x68 lr : ceph_unlink+0x6c4/0x720 sp : ffff80012173bc90 x29: ffff80012173bc90 x28: ffff086d0a45aaf8 x27: ffff0871d0eb5680 x26: ffff087f2a64a718 x25: 0000020000000180 x24: 0000000061c88647 x23: 0000000000000002 x22: ffff07ff9236d800 x21: 0000000000001203 x20: ffff07ff9237b000 x19: ffff088b8296afc0 x18: 00000000f3c93365 x17: 0000000000070000 x16: ffff08faffcbdfe8 x15: ffff08faffcbdfec x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 45445f65645f3037 x12: 34385f6369706f74 x11: 0000a2653104bb20 x10: ffffd85f26d73290 x9 : ffffd85f25664f94 x8 : 00000000000000c0 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000002 x5 : 0000000000000081 x4 : 0000000000000481 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff08727d3f91e8 Call trace: drop_nlink+0x50/0x68 (P) vfs_unlink+0xb0/0x2e8 do_unlinkat+0x204/0x288 __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x3c/0x80 invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x54/0xe8 do_el0_svc+0xa4/0xc8 el0_svc+0x18/0x58 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x104/0x130 el0t_64_sync+0x154/0x158 In ceph_unlink(), a call to ceph_mdsc_submit_request() submits the CEPH_MDS_OP_UNLINK to the MDS, but does not wait for completion. Meanwhile, between this call and the following drop_nlink() call, a worker thread may process a CEPH_CAP_OP_IMPORT, CEPH_CAP_OP_GRANT or just a CEPH_MSG_CLIENT_REPLY (the latter of which could be our own completion). These will lead to a set_nlink() call, updating the `i_nlink` counter to the value received from the MDS. If that new `i_nlink` value happens to be zero, it is illegal to decrement it further. But that is exactly what ceph_unlink() will do then. The WARNING can be reproduced this way: 1. Force async unlink; only the async code path is affected. Having no real clue about Ceph internals, I was unable to find out why the MDS wouldn't give me the "Fxr" capabilities, so I patched get_caps_for_async_unlink() to always succeed. (Note that the WARNING dump above was found on an unpatched kernel, without this kludge - this is not a theoretical bug.) 2. Add a sleep call after ceph_mdsc_submit_request() so the unlink completion gets handled by a worker thread before drop_nlink() is called. This guarantees that the `i_nlink` is already zero before drop_nlink() runs. The solution is to skip the counter decrement when it is already zero, but doing so without a lock is still racy (TOCTOU). Since ceph_fill_inode() and handle_cap_grant() both hold the `ceph_inode_info.i_ceph_lock` spinlock while set_nlink() runs, this seems like the proper lock to protect the `i_nlink` updates. I found prior art in NFS and SMB (using `inode.i_lock`) and AFS (using `afs_vnode.cb_lock`). All three have the zero check as well.

CVSS metrics

3 scores · 3 sources · 1 version

EPSS trend

Probability

0.11%

Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

Percentile

1%

Versus all other CVEs

30-day change

+0.02 pp

From 0.09% on 21-09-2026

21-09-202621-10-2026
EPSS score
0.11%

Known exploited

Compare KEV catalogs

Not in any of the 3 tracked catalogs.

Public exploits

0 found

No public exploits indexed.

Weaknesses

CWE · root cause

Affected systems

Ubuntu145 products
  • linux< 5.15.0-186.196 | < 6.8.0-136.136 | All versions (No fix recorded)
  • linux-allwinner-5.19All versions (No fix recorded)
  • linux-aws< 5.15.0-1112.119 | < 6.8.0-1061.64 | All versions (No fix recorded)
  • linux-aws-5.0All versions (No fix recorded)
  • linux-aws-5.11All versions (No fix recorded)
Linux2 products
  • linux≥ 2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f, < 9b31e88ac5623d15c8bc46f69dfe1d3b43a8f67c | ≥ 2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f, < 6d5fd8bb574bef039eb3b738e523870433a2aeb9 | ≥ 2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f, < fcc477a6e8856c8a42b3c9e171724d8d6dfadd06 | ≥ 2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f, < b3f5513141ecc6b277a8f7b7efe58a0cf9a5e859 | ≥ 2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f, < aedd29386b23f3e1e6818943e11abfff2953732f | ≥ 2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f, < 7db008e85a5d17b64bc5390b828bf457ae91a415 | ≥ 2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f, < 8975b85b0d45ca811ace6fac5907652f2310e5ac | ≥ 2ccb45462aeaf0831397b90d31d3d50a7704fa1f, < ce0123cbb4a40a2f1bbb815f292b26e96088639f | 5.7
  • linux_kernel≥ 5.7, < 5.10.253 | ≥ 5.11, < 5.15.203 | ≥ 5.16, < 6.1.167 | ≥ 6.2, < 6.6.130 | ≥ 6.7, < 6.12.78 | ≥ 6.13, < 6.18.19 | ≥ 6.19, < 6.19.9 | 7.0:rc1 | 7.0:rc2 | 7.0:rc3
Debian1 product
  • linux< 6.1.170-1 | < 6.12.85-1 | < 6.19.10-1

3 vendors · 148 products

References

39 links
Show all 39 references