CVE-2026-63073: Untrusted Sender DN Used as Format String in CMP Response Validation
Vulnerability summary
CVE-2026-63073 is a critical (CVSS 9.8) vulnerability in openssl. EPSS estimates a 1.16% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 67.1% of scored vulnerabilities.
Severe, CVSS 9.8 (CVE.org); no exploitation reported by the 5 checked sources; EPSS 1% (FIRST, 03-11-2026)
Source freshness unavailable
How is this decided?Advisory lineage
Upstream 0 · Downstream 11 · Related 6Timeline
- 25-08-2026PublishedVulnerability first disclosed.
- 31-08-2026Last modifiedVulnerability information updated.
Description
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_data()`. Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender. CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String) Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses. Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution. FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVSS metrics
7 scores · 7 sources · 1 version- OSV · AlpineEcosystem advisory · calculated9.8CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- OSV · UbuntuEcosystem advisory · calculated9.8CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- OSV · DebianEcosystem advisory · calculated9.8CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- OSV · ChainguardEcosystem advisory · calculated9.8CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- NVDNIST9.8CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- OSV · WolfiEcosystem advisory · calculated9.8CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS trend
Probability
1.16%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days
Percentile
67%
Versus all other CVEs
30-day change
No change 0.00 pp
From 1.16% on 04-10-2026
Known exploited
Compare KEV catalogsNot in the CISA KEV catalog.
Not in the ENISA CNW catalog.
Not in the CIRCL catalog.
Public exploits
0 foundNo public exploits indexed.
Weaknesses
CWE · root causeAffected systems
Known conditions: network-reachable, no authentication, no user interaction (CVSS vector). Other conditions: not stated in public data.
Chainguard14 products
- eco-python-openssl-4< 4.0.2-r0
- eco-python-openssl-4-pyca< 4.0.2-r0
- eco-python-openssl-4-pyca-dev< 4.0.2-r0
- openssl-3.5< 3.5.8-r0
- openssl-3.5-libcrypto< 3.5.8-r0
Ubuntu4 products
- edk2All versions (No fix recorded)
- edk2-hweAll versions (No fix recorded)
- nodejsAll versions (No fix recorded)
- openssl< 3.5.5-1ubuntu3.4
Wolfi3 products
- openssl-4.0< 4.0.2-r0
- openssl-4.0-libcrypto< 4.0.2-r0
- openssl-4.0-libssl< 4.0.2-r0
Alpine1 product
- openssl≥ 3.4.0, < 3.3.7-r1 | ≥ 3.4.0, < 3.5.8-r0
Debian1 product
- openssl< 3.5.7-1~deb13u2 | < 3.6.4-1
Openssl1 product
- openssl≥ 3.4.0, < 3.4.7 | ≥ 3.5.0, < 3.5.8 | ≥ 3.6.0, < 3.6.4 | ≥ 4.0.0, < 4.0.2
6 vendors · 24 products