CVE-2026-63073
Vulnerability Summary
Timeline
Description
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_data()`. Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender. CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String) Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses. Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution. FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVSS Metrics
- v3.1•CRITICAL•Score: 9.8CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Trends
Current EPSS score: 0.93%• Percentile: 59%
Techniques & Countermeasures
- CWE-134•Use of Externally-Controlled Format String
The product uses a function that accepts a format string as an argument, but the format string originates from an external source.
Affected Systems
- alpine•openssl
< 3.5.8-r0 | < 3.5.8-r0 | < 3.5.8-r0 | ≥ 3.4.0, < 3.3.7-r1 | ≥ 3.4.0, < 3.5.8-r0 | ≥ 3.4.0, < 3.5.8-r0 | ≥ 3.4.0, < 3.5.8-r0
- chainguard•eco-python-openssl-4
all | < 4.0.2-r0
- chainguard•eco-python-openssl-4-pyca
all | < 4.0.2-r0
- chainguard•eco-python-openssl-4-pyca-dev
all | < 4.0.2-r0
- chainguard•openssl-provider-fips-3.4.0
all | < 0
- chainguard•openssl-provider-fips-3.4.0-dbg
all
- chainguard•openssl-provider-fips-3.6.0
all
- chainguard•openssl-provider-fips-3.6.0-dbg
all | < 0
- debian•openssl
all | < 3.5.7-1~deb13u2 | < 3.6.4-1
- ubuntu•edk2
all
- ubuntu•edk2-hwe
all
- ubuntu•nodejs
all
- ubuntu•openssl
< 3.5.5-1ubuntu3.4
- ubuntu•openssl-fips
all
- openssl•openssl
≥ 3.4.0, < 3.4.7 | ≥ 3.5.0, < 3.5.8 | ≥ 3.6.0, < 3.6.4 | ≥ 4.0.0, < 4.0.2
References (12)
- https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7eb2e3ec9d1d4f35c8022fccd4b03398b3f33e21
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6a0acc072b4d37a7cac1252a29c1ce1f00c5ec29
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/0cc20b322639919aa423e90799d9a57c3b4b76ca
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7e5a6eea8fd3ccca6b6fbba031a5fbf8a3d93b4
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-63073
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63073
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63073
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8678-1
- https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-63073
- https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/63xxx/CVE-2026-63073.json
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63073