CVE-2026-68315: linux Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Vulnerability summary
CVE-2026-68315 is a high (CVSS 7.5) Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability in linux. EPSS estimates a 0.51% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 42.4% of scored vulnerabilities.
Advisory lineage
Upstream 0 · Downstream 33 · Related 27Timeline
- 10-08-2026PublishedVulnerability first disclosed.
- 19-10-2026Last modifiedVulnerability information updated.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() When processing a RESET_IN_REQUEST from a peer, sctp_process_strreset_inreq() derives the stream count from the parameter length but does not check whether the resulting RESET_OUT_REQUEST would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN. The OUT request header (sctp_strreset_outreq, 16 bytes) is 8 bytes larger than the IN request header (sctp_strreset_inreq, 8 bytes). Generally, the IP payload is bounded to 65535 bytes, so the stream list cannot be large enough to trigger the overflow. However, on interfaces with MTU > 65535 (e.g., loopback with IPv6 jumbograms), a stream list that fits within the incoming IN parameter can cause a __u16 overflow in sctp_make_strreset_req() when computing the OUT request size, leading to an undersized skb allocation and a kernel BUG: net/core/skbuff.c:207 skb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:2625 skb_put net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1535 sctp_addto_chunk net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:3695 sctp_make_strreset_req net/sctp/stream.c:655 sctp_process_strreset_inreq The local setsockopt path validates the generated reset request size. However, for an incoming-only reset, it accounts for the smaller IN request even though the peer must generate an OUT request with the same stream list. Such a request cannot be completed successfully by the peer. Reject peer IN requests whose corresponding OUT request would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN. Also tighten the local check so it does not send an IN request that would require an oversized OUT request from the peer.
CVSS metrics
4 scores · 4 sources · 1 version- OSV · UbuntuEcosystem advisory · calculated7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- OSV · DebianEcosystem advisory · calculated7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- NVDNIST7.5HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS trend
Probability
0.51%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days
Percentile
42%
Versus all other CVEs
30-day change
-0.01 pp
From 0.52% on 20-09-2026
Known exploited
Compare KEV catalogsNot in any of the 3 tracked catalogs.
Public exploits
0 foundNo public exploits indexed.
Weaknesses
CWE · root causeAffected systems
Ubuntu168 products
- linuxAll versions (No fix recorded) | < 5.15.0-198.208 | < 6.8.0-147.147 | < 7.0.0-38.38
- linux-allwinner-5.19All versions (No fix recorded)
- linux-awsAll versions (No fix recorded) | < 5.15.0-1117.124 | < 6.8.0-1067.70 | < 7.0.0-1014.14
- linux-aws-5.0All versions (No fix recorded)
- linux-aws-5.11All versions (No fix recorded)
Debian2 products
- linux< 6.1.187-1 | < 6.12.101-1 | < 7.1.6-1
- linux-6.12< 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
Linux1 product
- linux≥ 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137, < 61327d8e7cfb0259d527be17202630f556213249 | ≥ 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137, < 7cf7439948e3bf639119119922c88ec190874ca3 | ≥ 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137, < 60c47dea5d320d2fc706e9aad1db38a04df0a056 | ≥ 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137, < b255d8cd6cc68045ae9eecbac3b3c14e1f176c9b | ≥ 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137, < 6f0e39d180cd7cced647381b6fa14fd83d261047 | ≥ 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137, < 1a10fe1aa9c01f41b389a31906a77d538637c9d9 | ≥ 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137, < 00ae679cb21a035491fdad8d58dc6d79cc68b675 | ≥ 7f9d68ac944e24ee5f9ac8d059ca00b1c1d34137, < 18ae07691d43183d270de8be9dc8e027906015d9 | 4.11
3 vendors · 171 products